Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
- Keyword
-
- Antidumping (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Cotton (1)
- DOJ (1)
- Department of Justice (1)
-
- England (1)
- Extradition (1)
- GATT (1)
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1)
- Investment in legal practice (1)
- Legal services (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Multidisciplinary practice (1)
- New York (1)
- Regulation of lawyers (1)
- Subsidies (1)
- Trade remedies (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- United Kingdom Legal Services Act 2007 (1)
- WTO (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antidumping And Cotton Subsidies: A Market-Based Defense Of Unfair Trade Remedies, Nadia E. Nedzel
Antidumping And Cotton Subsidies: A Market-Based Defense Of Unfair Trade Remedies, Nadia E. Nedzel
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
This article argues that trade remedies, problematic though they may be, provide a legal framework in which litigation can and must be promulgated to protect the benefits of a global market economy.
International Legal Practice Involving England And New York Following Adoption Of The United Kingdom Legal Services Act Of 2007, Sydney M. Iii Cone
International Legal Practice Involving England And New York Following Adoption Of The United Kingdom Legal Services Act Of 2007, Sydney M. Iii Cone
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
This article deals with the regulation of legal services in England and New York in the context of, first, multidisciplinary practice ("MDP") and, second, permitted investment in legal practice. The article summarizes both the background of and potential differences between the regulations in those two jurisdictions, and comments on the possible reconciliation of those differences. Because, chronologically, New York was the first of the two jurisdictions under consideration to adopt rules on MDP, the New York rules will be considered first, and the more recent statute, known as the United Kingdom Legal Services Act 2007 (hereinafter "U.K. Act"), will then …
"Perfectly Properly Triable" In The United States: Is Extradition A Real And Significant Threat To Foreign Antitrust Offenders?, Daseul Kim
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
Seeking extradition of foreign officers in charge of foreign corporations for trial in the United States is one of the latest policies that the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") has adopted to enforce U.S. antitrust laws internationally. As a result, the world has become a much riskier place for foreign officers and executives, who, in the past, could practically ignore U.S. antitrust laws and still hide safely behind the protection of their own countries' borders. The DOJ expects this "real and significant" threat of extradition to incentivize foreign corporate officers to comply with U.S. antitrust laws by altering their conduct, …