Law Commons^™

Misuse Of The Antitrust Laws: The Competitor Plaintiff, Edward A. Snyder, Thomas E. Kauper

Michigan Law Review

In this article we ask (1) under what circumstances are competitor suits meritorious, and (2) do existing rules, such as those requiring proof of market power or other so-called filters and the requirement that plaintiffs suffer "antitrust injury," afford a reasonable prospect of eliminating anticompetitive misuses of the remedy by competitor plaintiffs? We evaluate a sample of seventy-four cases in which plaintiffs sued their rivals to learn how competitor plaintiffs use the private antitrust remedy. And because many of these cases allege anticompetitive exclusionary practices, we consider how recent theories of exclusionary practices may be used to support competitor claims. …

Albrecht After Arco: Maximum Resale Price Fixing Moves Toward The Rule Of Reason, Roger D. Blair, Gordon L. Lang

Vanderbilt Law Review

For some time, both economic and legal commentators have recognized the economic irrationality of the Supreme Court's ruling in Albrecht v. Herald Co. which prohibited the imposition of maximum resale prices by a supplier on its resellers. Ordinarily, unwise decisions receive critical reviews and eventually lose their force as they are over-ruled explicitly or by implication in subsequent decisions. In order for this evolution to occur, however, the Court must be presented with an opportunity to alter its earlier rulings. Recently, the Supreme Court had just such an opportunity to revisit the Albrecht rule in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA …

The Prescriptive Jurisdictional Reach Of U.S. Antitrust Law: Judge Learned Hand's Requirement Of A "Substantive Anticompetitive Effect", Michael F. Kelley

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

Clayton Act Scrutiny Of Nonprofit Hospital Mergers: The Wrong Rx For Ailing Institutions, David L. Glazer

Washington Law Review

The Sherman and Clayton antitrust laws have long been used to challenge anticompetitive mergers between for-profit entities. Recently, the federal government began challenging mergers between nonprofit hospitals under the Clayton Act. Two federal circuit courts are divided on whether nonprofit mergers are subject to Clayton Act scrutiny. This Comment examines the statutory interpretations and the policy arguments suggested by the two cases, and concludes that the Clayton Act does not, and should not, apply to nonprofit hospital mergers.

Economic Rents And Essential Facilities, Keith N. Hylton

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Antitrust, Michael Eric Ross

Mercer Law Review

The antitrust docket of the Eleventh Circuit last year mirrored the general state of antitrust law in several respects. It included only five full blown decisions, three involved health care, and defendants had won below in all five cases. On the other hand, the Eleventh Circuit went against the antitrust grain in 1990 by finding for plaintiffs in three of its five opinions and again refusing to be mesmerized by contemporary economic arguments. Moreover, a few of the Eleventh Circuit's specific antitrust holdings rendered last term might fairly be questioned.

This Article discusses each of the Eleventh Circuit's 1990 antitrust …

Antitrust Immunity Under Florida's Certificate Of Need Program, Scott D. Makar

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tax Considerations In Foreign Trade And Investment In The Ussr, Michael Newcity

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The purpose of this Article is to provide a primer on the tax treatment accorded in the USSR to the various forms of income that foreign companies and individuals may earn in the course of doing business or otherwise investing there. This Article will not provide exhaustive answers to all questions arising in connection with the taxation of income earned by foreign businesses in the USSR. Such exhaustive answers are not currently possible because of frequent changes in Soviet tax legislation and the lack of comprehensive and sophisticated regulations interpreting that legislation.

The Soviet Government, at both the union and …

Trade And Investment In Central And Eastern Europe: A Bibliographic Survey Of Current Literature In English, Igor I. Kavass, William M. Walker

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The year 1989 will be remembered as an important year in the histories of the Central and Eastern European countries because of the demise of the Soviet-controlled regimes and the emergence of independent and largely pluralistic political movements. A major catalyst for such radical political change was the decline of the centralized command economies in the Central and Eastern European countries. These so-called "Soviet Bloc" countries modeled their economic systems after the Soviet Union and, like the Soviet model, these countries found themselves saddled with an increasingly inefficient economic system. When the political systems changed, the new governments immediately took …

Determining The Indirect Purchaser's Right To Sue In The Conte:Tt Of Regulated Utilities: Kansas & Missouri V. Utilicorp United, Inc., Brett L. Hopper

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Retracing The Antitrust Roots Of Section 1972 Of The Bank Holding Company Act, Daniel Aronowitz

Vanderbilt Law Review

In 1956 Congress enacted the Bank Holding Company Act' (BHCA) to provide safeguards against undue concentration in the control of banking activities. Congress intended the regulations to protect the economy from anticompetitive combinations of banking and non- banking enterprises held under singular control. Still concerned with the faded "line" between banking and commerce, in 1970 Congress in- creased the scope' of the BHCA with a series of amendments, including an anti-tying provision.

Specifically, 12 U.S.C. section 1972 prohibits anticompetitive practices that "require bank customers to accept or provide some other service or product or refrain from dealing with other parties" …

Bringing Meaning To Interest Balancing In Transnational Litigation, Spencer W. Waller

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Article contends that the current state of the debate over the balancing of interests in the extraterritorial application of United States law is outmoded and in need of serious reexamination. Most commentators and scholars continue to focus on the area of jurisdiction to prescribe, the acceptability of the effects test, and the development of lists of United States and foreign interests to be balanced by a United States court before exercising jurisdiction.

Professor Waller contends that this debate is no longer productive. Extraterritoriality, with some limitations for the interests of other states, is an accepted feature of United States …

Case Digest, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ABROAD BY UNITED STATES PHYSICIAN IN CONNECTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF STATE REGULATIONS GOVERNING TORT CLAIMS PROVIDED FOR AN INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY AGENCY DECISION--AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT HOLDS NO CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS TO EVALUATE MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIM ON THE MERITS AND IN ACCORD WITH MINIMAL DUE PROCESS. Tarpeh-Doe v. United States, 904 F.2d719 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT DOES NOT CREATE AN IMPLIED PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION THAT KENTUCKY TOBACCO GROWERS COULD USE TO RECOVER DAMAGES FROM COMPANIES THAT ALLEGEDLY ENGAGED IN CORRUPT PRACTICES TO THE DETRIMENT OF GROWERS. THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE, HOWEVER, DOES …

University Of Richmond Law Review

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski

University of Richmond Law Review

Virginia federal courts have shown a reluctance this past year to summarily dismiss plaintiffs' antitrust claims on Rule 12(b)(6) motions where there is no factual record. However, once a sufficient record has been established, the courts have continued their rigorous scrutiny of antitrust claims. While this year's decisions contain few victories for antitrust plaintiffs on the merits, surprisingly, their holdings are mixed and cannot be categorized as decidedly pro-plaintiff or defendant. This past year, the Fourth Circuit has limited plaintiffs' actions by broadening the sweep of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine established in Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. to include …

The Role Of Antitrust Policy In The Development Of Australian-New Zealand Free Trade, Rex J. Ahdar

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

This article examines some antitrust aspects of the Australia-New Zealand free trade accord. The first section will trace the development of trans-Tasman2 free trade, noting the long history of efforts to liberalize trade between the two countries. The next part analyzes the role antitrust law played in the movement to free trade. The final two sections raise a number of outstanding issues and problems yet to be resolved by Australia and New Zealand policy makers.

Field-Of-Use Restrictions As Precompetitive Elements In Patent And Know-How Licensing Agreements In The United States And The European Communities, Thomas C. Meyers

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

The courts of both the United States and the European Communities have upheld the legality of various licensing restrictions. One such restriction, the "field-of-use" restriction, is the subject of this article. A field-of-use restriction prohibits a licensee from realizing the benefits of the license in certain technical fields. Field-of-use restrictions are usually written as restricting use to a particular field rather than listing prohibited fields… This article first sets forth an economic justification for the legality of field-of-use restrictions, concluding that such restrictions are usually pro-competitive. The article then analyzes the relevant law in both the United States and the …

Antitrust Damages For Consumer Welfare Loss, David C. Hjelmfelt, Channing D. Strother Jr.

Cleveland State Law Review

Section 4 of the Clayton Act provides that any person who is injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws "shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained." The current private enforcement model usually permits plaintiffs to recover damages based upon the excessive prices charged to consumers. However, economists see the real loss to society from an antitrust violation to be the consumer welfare loss which results from reduced output. The authors have been unable to locate any antitrust case which has permitted recovery of damages for this consumer welfare loss. Therefore, this …