Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Clayton Act (4)
- Competition (3)
- Sherman Act (3)
- Monopoly (2)
- Robinson-Patman Act (2)
-
- Attorney General (1)
- Boundary (1)
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United States (1)
- Capitalism (1)
- Civil appeal (1)
- Collateral issue (1)
- Corporate merger (1)
- Direct appeal (1)
- Economist (1)
- Expediting Act (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Government civil antitrust (1)
- Interlocutory appeal (1)
- Interstate Commerce Act (1)
- Laissez-faire (1)
- Lanham Act (1)
- Market dominance (1)
- Market share (1)
- Merger (1)
- Neutrality (1)
- Patent (1)
- Per se (1)
- Per se violation (1)
- Railroad (1)
- Rule-of-reason (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Oppenheim: Unfair Trade Practices, Cases And Comments, Glen E. Weston
Oppenheim: Unfair Trade Practices, Cases And Comments, Glen E. Weston
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Unfair Trade Practices, Cases and Comments by S. Chesterfield Oppenheim
Phillips: Perspectives On Antitrust Policy, Edwin W. Tucker
Phillips: Perspectives On Antitrust Policy, Edwin W. Tucker
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Perspectives on Antitrust Policy edited by Almarin Phillips
The Relativity Of Economic Evidence In Merger Cases-Emerging Decisions Force The Issue, Betty Bock
The Relativity Of Economic Evidence In Merger Cases-Emerging Decisions Force The Issue, Betty Bock
Michigan Law Review
The following discussion explores the interaction between law and economics as these two disciplines relate to the issues which arise under section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended in 1950, and examines the correlative problems implicit in the working arrangements between lawyers and economists when they are asked to counsel an enforcement agency or an acquiring or acquired company concerning the potential competitive consequences of a merger.
The Antitrust Expediting Act- A Critical Reappraisal, Robert C. Bonges
The Antitrust Expediting Act- A Critical Reappraisal, Robert C. Bonges
Michigan Law Review
The Expediting Act has been subject to some rather severe criticism from the bench and bar. At the extreme, it has been suggested that the act be repealed and the procedure for appealing government civil antitrust cases be completely overhauled. Even proponents of the act have acknowledged its need of revision, but there is little agreement among them on the extent and nature of desirable change. This comment will explore the origins, development, and current role of the Expediting Act in order to help determine what course revision, if it is needed, should follow.
Federal Law Held To Govern Effect Of The Release Of A Joint Tortfeasor In Private Antitrust Suit-Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc. V. Twentieth Century Fox Film Co., Michigan Law Review
Federal Law Held To Govern Effect Of The Release Of A Joint Tortfeasor In Private Antitrust Suit-Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc. V. Twentieth Century Fox Film Co., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Private antitrust litigation occasionally raises the question of whether state or federal law should be applied to determine the effect of the release of a joint tortfeasor. When federal law is applied, as it was in Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Co., there remains the necessity of formulating a rule of federal law, since there appears to be no established federal rule governing releases in antitrust suits.
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Several independent franchised soft ice-cream outlets brought suit for treble damages against Carvel Corporation, the franchising company, alleging that the contract between them constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of section 3 of the Clayton Act and sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The contract bound the dealers to purchase from Carvel-appointed suppliers all commodities sold as part of the retail dairy composite. Plaintiffs stipulated that they would rely on per se violations at trial. The district court found that the plaintiffs had failed to show the alleged violations and, in any case, the defendant had proved …
Icc Conditions Merger Approval Upon Retention Of Jurisdiction To Allow Inclusion Of Additional Railroads In The Future, Michigan Law Review
Icc Conditions Merger Approval Upon Retention Of Jurisdiction To Allow Inclusion Of Additional Railroads In The Future, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In two recent merger proceedings under section 5(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act, Seaboard Air Line R.R. - Merger-Atlantic Coast Line R.R. and Norfolk & W. Ry. and New York, C. & St. L. R.R.-Merger, the Interstate Commerce Commission imposed conditions" whereby it retained jurisdiction over the proceedings for five years to allow specified railroads to petition for inclusion in the new railway systems. Their inclusion would be ordered if found by the Commission, after a full hearing, to be consistent with the public interest.