Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Air Commerce Act of 1926 (1)
- Ellis v. Loftus Iron Co. (1)
- Evidence of injury (1)
- Harrington v. McCarthy (1)
- International Flying Convention of 1919 (1)
-
- Law of the Air (1)
- Massachusetts (1)
- Ohio Act of 1929 (1)
- Pan-American Conference of 1928 (1)
- Private property (1)
- Restricted airspaces (1)
- Right of way (1)
- Smith v. New England Aircraft Co. (1)
- Smith v. Smith (1)
- Swetland et al. v. Curtiss Airports Corporation et al. (1)
- Technical trespasses (1)
- Uniform Aeronautics Law (1)
- Uniform State Law for Aeronautics (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Aviation-Trespass-Nuisance
Michigan Law Review
Land-owners sought to enjoin flight over their property as a trespass and nuisance; and to enjoin as a nuisance the use of the adjoining field as a base from which to make such flights. Held, injunction denied because of insufficient evidence of injury. Flight at 500 feet or more was impliedly authorized by the statute forbidding flight lit less than that attitude over buildings or persons. Mass. Acts, 1922, ch. 534, sec. 1 sub-sec. 55. As to occasional flights over unoccupied brush land at a height of about 100 feet in landing or taking off, injunctive relief was denied …
Law Of The Air, Byron K. Elliott
Aerial Navigation
Michigan Law Review
With the rapid increase of the use of the air by airplanes and other craft, courts are bound to be called upon frequently to determine the rights and liabilities of the owners and operators of aircraft with reference to other persons in various positions. It is probable that, as was found to be true in the cases of other new devices, the principles of the common law are sufficiently elastic and adaptable to determine the settlement of most, if not all, of the controversies.
Negligence In The Operation Of Aircraft, James W. Stites
Negligence In The Operation Of Aircraft, James W. Stites
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.