Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of Lvmpd V. Blackjack Bonding, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 10, Sydney Gambee
Summary Of Lvmpd V. Blackjack Bonding, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 10, Sydney Gambee
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined that (1) the records of CCDC inmate calls were public records within LVMPD’s legal custody or control under the NPRA;[1] and (2) that Blackjack Bonding was the prevailing party and was therefore entitled to a statutorily mandated award attorney fees and costs,[2] regardless of their court-ordered responsibility to pay costs associated with production.
[1] See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 239.010 (2011).
[2] See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 239.011 (2011).