Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative proceedings (1)
- Article III (1)
- Bremerton (1)
- Brown (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Discretion (1)
- Dobbs (1)
- Equity (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Federal Judiciary (1)
- Fifth Circuit (1)
- Financial crisis (1)
- Financial markets (1)
- In-house administrative proceedings (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Investors (1)
- Jarkesy v. SEC (1)
- Judicial Activism (1)
- Judicial Restraint (1)
- Judicial Role (1)
- Lawrence (1)
- Recusal (1)
- Remedies (1)
- SEC (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- Shadow Docket (1)
- Stare Decisis (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Jarkesy V. Sec: Are Federal Courts Pushing The U.S. Toward The Next Financial Crisis?, Jennifer Hill
Jarkesy V. Sec: Are Federal Courts Pushing The U.S. Toward The Next Financial Crisis?, Jennifer Hill
Pepperdine Law Review
In the wake of both the Great Depression and the Financial Crisis of 2008, Congress established and expanded the powers of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As part of this expansion, the SEC in-house administrative proceedings, designed to adjudicate SEC violations before the SEC’s administrative law judges (ALJs), were born. These in-house proceedings have faced multiple constitutional attacks in the past decade. In the most recent iteration of such challenges, Jarkesy v. SEC, the Fifth Circuit held that the SEC’s in-house proceedings were unconstitutional on three grounds: (1) the in-house proceedings deprived petitioners of their constitutional right to jury …
Judicial Fidelity, Caprice L. Roberts
Judicial Fidelity, Caprice L. Roberts
Pepperdine Law Review
Judicial critics abound. Some say the rule of law is dead across all three branches of government. Four are dead if you count the media as the fourth estate. All are in trouble, even if one approves of each branch’s headlines, but none of them are dead. Not yet. Pundits and scholars see the latest term of the Supreme Court as clear evidence of partisan politics and unbridled power. They decry an upheaval of laws and norms demonstrating the dire situation across the federal judiciary. Democracy is not dead even when the Court issues opinions that overturn precedent, upends long-standing …