Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- NAALJ (3)
- APA (2)
- Administrative Procedure Act (2)
- Board of Immigration Appeals (2)
-
- Congress (2)
- Contents (2)
- Editorial board (2)
- European Union (2)
- FDA (2)
- Food and Drug Administration (2)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Pepperdine University School of Law (2)
- Procedures (2)
- Separation of powers (2)
- Sessions (2)
- United States (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- 1983 action (1)
- ALJ (1)
- ARRA (1)
- Abuse of discretion (1)
- Adjudication (1)
- Administrative Adjudication (1)
- Administrative Conference of the United States (1)
- Administrative Law Judge (1)
- Administrative Law Judges (1)
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- Administrative agency (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
2020 Fellowship Topic Announcement, National Association Of Administrative Law Judiciary
2020 Fellowship Topic Announcement, National Association Of Administrative Law Judiciary
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Pepperdine University School Of Law Legal Summaries, Analise Nuxoll
Pepperdine University School Of Law Legal Summaries, Analise Nuxoll
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Puff Puff Pass The Legislation: A Comparison Of E-Cigarette Regulations Across Borders, Rachel E. Zarrabi
Puff Puff Pass The Legislation: A Comparison Of E-Cigarette Regulations Across Borders, Rachel E. Zarrabi
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This comment explores the types of legislation, approaches to regulating e-cigarettes, and analyzes whether the FDA’s campaign and current regulations are effective. So far, it appears that the United States is ahead of the game with its new, aggressive proposal for regulating e-cigarettes. The FDA is standing against the companies and products that target youthful consumers. Most countries acknowledge the gaps in current scientific research regarding the long-term health risks of vaping, and some are waiting to take a legislative stance until it is clearer which side of the health line e-cigarettes fall. Section II of this comment discusses the …
Beauty Shouldn’T Cause Pain: A Makeover Proposal For The Fda’S Cosmetics Regulation, Lauren Jacobs
Beauty Shouldn’T Cause Pain: A Makeover Proposal For The Fda’S Cosmetics Regulation, Lauren Jacobs
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The American cosmetics industry is not required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct pre-market safety assessments of cosmetics. The FDA only reviews personal care products when people voluntarily report problems. Further, companies continue to test animals for cosmetics, despite the FDA’s recommendation that manufacturers seek more humane and accurate testing. Although the FDA does not require animal testing for product safety or premarket approval, the United States is one of the largest users of laboratory animals for product testing. There are two pending pieces of legislation, which if passed would be the first acts of cosmetic regulation …
The Need For A Central Panel Approach To Administrative Adjudication: Pros, Cons, And Selected Practices, Malcolm C. Rich, Alison C. Goldstein
The Need For A Central Panel Approach To Administrative Adjudication: Pros, Cons, And Selected Practices, Malcolm C. Rich, Alison C. Goldstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The goal of this report is to document the growth of the central panel movement that has now emerged in a majority of states. This research is designed to provide data-informed recommendations to states and municipalities considering the adoption of a central panel system or the enlargement of the jurisdiction encompassed by an existing central panel as well as to states considering the adoption of a more final decision-making authority for their central panel ALJs. The work is also intended to inform the debate over whether the central panel approach is something that the federal government should consider. This research …
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Pepperdine University School Of Law Legal Summaries, Analise Nuxoll
Pepperdine University School Of Law Legal Summaries, Analise Nuxoll
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Slip Slidin' Away: The Erosion Of Apa Adjudication, William Funk
Slip Slidin' Away: The Erosion Of Apa Adjudication, William Funk
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Although the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) was intended to establish a uniform set of procedures applicable to adjudications "required by statute to be determined on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing," agencies have long sought to avoid those procedures, and, in particular, Administrative Law Judges, by substituting informal, non-APA adjudications. Over time, the courts have accelerated this substitution through a misapplication of three Supreme Court opinions. This article describes the original understanding of the APA and how that original understanding has been eroded over the years. The article then asks whether this is a problem …
Impartial Hearings Under The Idea: Legal Issues And Answers, Perry A. Zirkel
Impartial Hearings Under The Idea: Legal Issues And Answers, Perry A. Zirkel
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Chevron Deference In The States: Lessons From Three States, Carrie Townsend Ingram
Chevron Deference In The States: Lessons From Three States, Carrie Townsend Ingram
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The appointment of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court of the United States has left many wondering if a change to the Chevron doctrine is impending. Justice Gorsuch’s colleague on the Court, Justice Clarence Thomas, shares similar views on Chevron. This article will compare the federal rule to three different states: Indiana, Delaware, and Arizona. Each state has taken a different path in determining that the judiciary should not give deference to an agency’s interpretation of the statutes that it is charged with enforcing. Delaware has affirmatively declared that the Chevron doctrine is not applicable in its state. A …