Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Occupational Safety And Health Act, Industrial Union V. American Petroleum Institute, Patrick M. Vitone
Occupational Safety And Health Act, Industrial Union V. American Petroleum Institute, Patrick M. Vitone
Akron Law Review
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration [hereinafter cited as OSHA] was created pursuant to Title 29 of the United States Code, to define the terms of this battle. In Industrial Union v. American Petroleum Institute, the federal judiciary has taken a hand at making these terms somewhat more clear. It is the object of this casenote to analyze the impact of the Industrial Union decision on the regulatory processes of OSHA, a task which involves a synthesis of the plurality, concurring and dissenting opinions.
Judicial Review Of An Administrative Agency Rescission: Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association V. State Farm Mutal Automobile Insurance Company, Margot F. Reagan
Judicial Review Of An Administrative Agency Rescission: Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association V. State Farm Mutal Automobile Insurance Company, Margot F. Reagan
Akron Law Review
This casenote will summarize the legislative and political history of Standard 208. The casenote will then analyze the Supreme Court's recent decision in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual. It will conclude by considering the judicial review of administrative rulemaking and how the Court's decision will affect such review in the area of rescission of an agency action.
A Triptych Of Regulators: A New Perspective On The Administrative State, Yair Sagy
A Triptych Of Regulators: A New Perspective On The Administrative State, Yair Sagy
Akron Law Review
In combining past and present perspectives, this Article makes an important contribution to the literature: by isolating the three general prototypes pervading the literature, it introduces a greater degree of theoretical precision to the understanding of public regulation, and goes on to demonstrate how current regulatory schemes can be better understood using the triad of prototypes. This Article also suggests why we can expect these types to persist in future public regulation. At the same time, this Article joins and contributes to the study of the intellectual history of U.S. regulation by identifying deep undercurrents running throughout that history.