Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Air gaps (1)
- Attribution (1)
- Critical infrastructure (1)
- Cyberattack (1)
- Cybersecurity (1)
-
- Cyberwar (1)
- Digital warfare (1)
- Gatekeeper (1)
- Geneva Convention (1)
- Independent Group of Experts (IGE) (1)
- Intercarrier compensation (1)
- Interconnection (1)
- International humanitarian law (1)
- Jus ad bellum (1)
- Jus in bello (1)
- Kill switches (1)
- Law of armed conflict (1)
- Law of war (1)
- Telecommunications law (1)
- Telecommunications policy (1)
- Terminating access monopoly (1)
- Terminating monopoly (1)
- Unrestricted Warfare (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Engineering
Cyber Espionage Or Cyber War?: International Law, Domestic Law, And Self-Protective Measures, Christopher S. Yoo
Cyber Espionage Or Cyber War?: International Law, Domestic Law, And Self-Protective Measures, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Scholars have spent considerable effort determining how the law of war (particularly jus ad bellum and jus in bello) applies to cyber conflicts, epitomized by the Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Many prominent cyber operations fall outside the law of war, including the surveillance programs that Edward Snowden has alleged were conducted by the National Security Agency, the distributed denial of service attacks launched against Estonia and Georgia in 2007 and 2008, the 2008 Stuxnet virus designed to hinder the Iranian nuclear program, and the unrestricted cyber warfare described in the 1999 book by …
A Market-Oriented Analysis Of The 'Terminating Access Monopoly' Concept, Jonathan E. Nuechterlein, Christopher S. Yoo
A Market-Oriented Analysis Of The 'Terminating Access Monopoly' Concept, Jonathan E. Nuechterlein, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Policymakers have long invoked the concept of a “terminating access monopoly” to inform communications policy. Roughly speaking, the concept holds that a consumer-facing network provider, no matter how small or how subject to retail competition, generally possesses monopoly power vis-à-vis third-party senders of communications traffic to its customers. Regulators and advocates have routinely cited that concern to justify regulatory intervention in a variety of contexts where the regulated party may or may not have possessed market power in any relevant retail market.
Despite the centrality of the terminating access monopoly to modern communications policy, there is surprisingly little academic literature …