Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Engineering
Missouri River Stream Bank Erosion Assessment Gavins Point Dam To Ponca, Ne
Missouri River Stream Bank Erosion Assessment Gavins Point Dam To Ponca, Ne
US Army Corps of Engineers
The purpose of this report is to document the methodology and results obtained from a study of bank erosion along the Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam (RM 805.2) and Ponca, Nebraska (RM 752.3). Three (3) periods were studied: 1) August 1985 to August 1995, a time span of 10 years and; 2) from August 1995 and August 1997, a time span of 2 years. This study has been prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) under Contract No. DACW 45-97-D-0007 (Delivery Order 0019) for the Omaha District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Finding Of No Significant Impact Bank Stabilization Project Ponca State Park, Nebraska Missouri National Recreational River
US Army Corps of Engineers
An environmental assessment has been prepared that summarizes the expected effects of the proposed project on the existing environment. This is a project proposed by the Omaha District, Corps of Engineers to halt the erosion occurring along the riverfront at Ponca State Park in Dixon County, Nebraska, and protect the access road to the park's public boat ramp. This project is authorized under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act amendment of 1978 (Public Law 95-625). The proposed project is located along the right bank of the Missouri River between River Miles (RM) 753.9 and 753.5 at Ponca State Park about …
Final General Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement
Final General Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement
US Army Corps of Engineers
This Final General Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement presents three alternatives for the future of the Missouri National Recreational River: a continuation of existing (conditions (no-action) alternative, a resource protection/recreation (preferred) alternative emphasizing protection and enhancement of biologic values and the history and culture of the area, and a recreational emphasis alternative. In both action alternatives, the Corps of Engineers (COE) and the National Park Service (NPS) would manage the area through a cooperative agreement. The Corps of Engineers would function as the day-la-day manager of the water-related resources, while the National Park Service would administer the land-related resources. …