Education Commons^™

Acuta Enews December 1986, Vol. 15, No. 12

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

Loyola University, New Orleans

Party Line

Region IV Hosts Seminar

Making the Phone Into a P.O. Box

Michael Toner Is First Recipient of Portfolio Award

Telecommunications Technology Seen Outpacing AI

Acuta Enews August 1986, Vol. 15, No. 8

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

President's Message

UNITS

Party Line

1986/87 ACUTA Board Of Directors

Communications Management: An Evolving Role

Acuta Enews July 1986, Vol. 15, No. 7

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

Fall Seminar --- Orlando, Florida

Party Line

When Growth & Technology Spur Phone-system Change

Dial M For Madness

Acuta Enews May & June 1986, Vol. 15, No. 5 & 6

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

President's Message

Party Line

Illinois Universities

Simplified Message Desk Interface

Pro & Con: Should Users Keep Network Control In-House?

DMI or CPI: Who will win?

Committed To Telecommunication Excellence

Look Boss, No Coax!

Acuta Enews April 1986, Vol. 15, No. 4

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

President's Message

Party Line

Telecom Department Compensation: 1985

System 86 Cutover at Cornell

Selling

Developing The Personalized System Of Instruction For The Basic Speech Communication Course, William J. Seiler, Marilyn Fuss-Reineck

Department of Communication Studies: Faculty Publications

The purpose of this article is to discuss major planning and development decisions required in order to use the Personalized System of Instruction (PSI) method in the basic speech communication course. In this article we examine: (1) how major PSI components are implemented and (2) how the PSI course is managed. By documenting the decisions required to use PSI in speech communication courses which include performances, we hope to provide helpful guidelines for those interested in applying the PSI method to their basic speech communication courses.

Acuta Enews March 1986, Vol. 15, No. 1986

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

President's Message

Party Line

Centrex -- How Viable Today? Tomorrow?

Consultant's Corner

Accunent Switched 56 is providing switched digital transmission now

Acuta Enews February 1986, Vol. 15, No. 2

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

President's Message

Party Line

ACUTA Spring Seminar

Columbia University

Data Network Considerations

Project Description- Systems Management and Billing

Project Description- Stations

Bits & Pieces

Acuta Enews January 1986, Vol. 15, No. 1

ACUTA Newsletters

In This Issue

President's Message

Shared Tenant Services at Colleges and Universities

Can you hear me?

Party Line

New Product

The University of Central Florida

Telephone Registration

Factors Limiting Vocational Agriculture Student Participation In Supervised Occupational Experience Programs In Nebraska, Richard M. Foster

Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication: Faculty Publications

The primary purpose of this study was to identify factors limiting student participation in supervised occupational experience (SOE) programs in Nebraska, as perceived by Nebraska vocational agriculture instructors. Specific objectives included:

1. Identify SOE-related characteristics of Nebraska vocational agriculture instructors.
2. Determine the Importance of selected school district, vocational agriculture, economic, student, and social factors in limiting student participation in SOE.
3. Determine differences among factors limiting student participation in SOE by length of contract, number of SOE on-site instructional visits per year, hours employed, in addition to vocational agriculture duties and years of teaching experience.

The Identification And Prioritization Of Tasks Of Vocational Agriculture Instructors As Perceived By State Supervisors, Teacher Educators, And Vocational Agriculture Instructors In Nebraska, Allen G. Blezek

Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication: Faculty Publications

Purpose of the Study

The study was conducted to determine what vocational agriculture instructors, teacher educators and state supervisors in vocational agriculture perceived as being the task priorities of Nebraska vocational agriculture instructors.

Specifically, the major objectives were to:

1. Identify the major tasks of Nebraska vocational agriculture instructors.
2. Prioritize major tasks of Nebraska vocational agriculture instructors as perceived by state supervisors, teacher educators and vocational agriculture instructors.
3. Compare priority rating of tasks by state supervisors, teacher educators, and vocational agriculture Instructors.