Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Corporate Records (51)
- Popular Media (3)
- Arts & Sciences Faculty Publications (1)
- Executives, Administrators, & Staff Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
-
- Faculty Senate Index (1)
- Faculty Senate Minutes (1)
- Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council Online Archive (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Leadership, Counseling, Adult, Career and Higher Education Faculty Publications (1)
- Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- New England Resource Center for Higher Education Publications (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Education
Creating And Celebrating Honors Faculty, Lynne C. Elkes
Creating And Celebrating Honors Faculty, Lynne C. Elkes
Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council Online Archive
Honors faculty are defined by their dedication to their craft and their enormous impact on students in every discipline. However, their role within the larger university setting is nebulous, leading to an undervaluation of their contributions to higher education in an era of negative perceptions of the industry. Honors faculty can be tenured, contingent, academic, or professors of the practice; in every case, questions of promotion, compensation, and teaching assignments make staffing an honors program in a consistent manner difficult at best. These programs, their students, and their faculty would benefit from a more standardized approach to effectively serve honors …
Academic Prioritization Or Killing The Liberal Arts?, Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt
Academic Prioritization Or Killing The Liberal Arts?, Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt
Faculty Publications
Dr. Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt, professor of English at Linfield College, laments the downsizing of liberal arts and humanities programs and departments by college administrators bent on promoting more "job-oriented" disciplines.
This essay originally appeared as part of Conditionally Accepted, a career advice blog for Inside Higher Ed providing news, information, personal stories, and resources for scholars who are, at best, conditionally accepted in academe. Conditionally Accepted is an anti-racist, pro-feminist, pro-queer, anti-transphobic, anti-fatphobic, anti-ableist, anti-ageist, anti-classist, and anti-xenophobic online community.
The Poor And Marginalized Among Us: Contingent Faculty In Jesuit Universities, Christina Pawls, Richard D. Clark, Carrie Buchanan
The Poor And Marginalized Among Us: Contingent Faculty In Jesuit Universities, Christina Pawls, Richard D. Clark, Carrie Buchanan
Arts & Sciences Faculty Publications
Faculty of institutions of higher learning have an opportunity to discuss, debate,and discern how to create workplaces that are just and inclusive.As members of Jesuit institutions, wehave a moral obligation to do so. How, then, can Jesuit universities justify the poor treatment of contingent faculty, who are now a majority not just in our institutions but in the country as a whole? Tenure-track employment is a fading tradition in universities throughout the United States. The data also show that non-tenure-track faculty, particularly the growing number of part-time adjunct faculty, constitute a population of marginalized, often poor,employees working alongside more privileged …
Podia And Pens: Dismantling The Two-Track System For Legal Research And Writing Faculty, Kristen K. Tiscione, Amy Vorenberg
Podia And Pens: Dismantling The Two-Track System For Legal Research And Writing Faculty, Kristen K. Tiscione, Amy Vorenberg
Law Faculty Scholarship
At the 2015 AALS Annual Meeting, a panel was convened under this title to discuss whether separate tracks and lower status for legal research and writing (“LRW”) faculty make sense given the current demand for legal educators to better train students for practice. The participants included law professors, an associate dean, and a federal judge.2 Each panelist was asked to respond to questions about the “two-track” system—a shorthand phrase for the two tracks of employment at many law schools whereby full-time LRW faculty are treated differently than tenured and tenure-track faculty. The panelists represented differing views on the topic. This …
Reforming Gendered Tenure Policies In U.S. Higher Education: A Policy Recommendation, Donald Mitchell Jr., Ph.D., Abigail Johnson, Laura Poglitsch
Reforming Gendered Tenure Policies In U.S. Higher Education: A Policy Recommendation, Donald Mitchell Jr., Ph.D., Abigail Johnson, Laura Poglitsch
Executives, Administrators, & Staff Publications
Men receive tenure more often than women in United States higher education. One reason may be due to current tenure policies. Within this article, the authors evaluate three policy alternatives—benefits packages targeting women, a three-track tenure process, and support programs—using the evaluative criteria effectiveness, affordability, administrative operability, and political feasibility to determine which alternative might be the best option for decreasing the tenure gap between men and women. Each policy alternative was assessed and ranked based on the outcomes associated with the identified criteria. The authors conclude by recommending the three-track tenure policy and suggesting ways to implement and evaluate …
The New Publishing Scene And The Tenure Case: An Administrator’S View, Daniele C. Struppa
The New Publishing Scene And The Tenure Case: An Administrator’S View, Daniele C. Struppa
Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science Faculty Articles and Research
No abstract provided.
Faculty Success: Developing A Research And Publication Agenda, Kathleen P. King
Faculty Success: Developing A Research And Publication Agenda, Kathleen P. King
Leadership, Counseling, Adult, Career and Higher Education Faculty Publications
Anyone associated with higher education will acknowledge that tenure track faculty have to perform a fantastic balancing act. Compared to an administrative or line role in an organization, higher education faculty have tremendous autonomy and freedom. However, they face competing demands of many different (and good) opportunities, and for them the stakes are always high. Help is here! This article introduces a powerful strategy for staying on track in the research strand of this competitive journey.
Procedure For Granting Tenure, Clara Krug
Brief 17: New Faculty: A Catalyst For Change, New England Resource Center For Higher Education, University Of Massachusetts Boston
Brief 17: New Faculty: A Catalyst For Change, New England Resource Center For Higher Education, University Of Massachusetts Boston
New England Resource Center for Higher Education Publications
The message of new faculty is not new, but their power may be. As the demand for new faculty increases due to retirements and increased enrollments in systems and institutions around the country, large cohorts of tenure-track faculty are being hired. Early-career faculty want what they’ve wanted for many years now: clarity surrounding the tenure process, a workload that is meaningful and manageable, professional development for research and teaching, a hospitable campus climate, a collegial workplace, work-family balance, equity, transparency, and fairness. Many young teacher scholars are interested in collaboration over competition, research that is organized around problems rather than …
The Minutes Of The Marshall University Faculty Senate Meeting, October 26, 2000, Marshall University Faculty Senate
The Minutes Of The Marshall University Faculty Senate Meeting, October 26, 2000, Marshall University Faculty Senate
Faculty Senate Minutes
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees March 26, 1987, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees March 26, 1987, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees March 24, 1986, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees March 24, 1986, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees July 22, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees July 22, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Educational Policy Commitee July 21, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees Educational Policy Commitee July 21, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Educational Policy Commitee May 19, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees Educational Policy Commitee May 19, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees February 25, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees February 25, 1985, Ellen N. Doughty, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
University Of Maine Board Of Trustees February 27, 1984, University Of Maine System
University Of Maine Board Of Trustees February 27, 1984, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees September 26, 1983, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees September 26, 1983, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
The University At Odds With Itself: Furtive Surveillance On Campus, William W. Van Alstyne
The University At Odds With Itself: Furtive Surveillance On Campus, William W. Van Alstyne
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees February 7, 1983, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees February 7, 1983, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees April 26, 1982, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees April 26, 1982, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees March 1, 1982, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees March 1, 1982, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees January 25, 1982, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees January 25, 1982, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Executive Committee January 25, 1982, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees Executive Committee January 25, 1982, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees December 7, 1981, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees December 7, 1981, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees July 27, 1981, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees July 27, 1981, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Executive Committee July 27, 1981, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees Executive Committee July 27, 1981, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees May 18, 1981, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees May 18, 1981, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Executive Committee May 18, 1981, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees Executive Committee May 18, 1981, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees February 24, 1981, University Of Maine System
Board Of Trustees February 24, 1981, University Of Maine System
Corporate Records
No abstract provided.