Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (1)
- 35 U.S.C. §§ 200–12 (2012) (1)
- Bayh-Dole Act (1)
- Blurred Lines (1)
- Campus sexual assault (1)
-
- College teachers -- Legal status (1)
- Commercialization (1)
- Consent (Law) (1)
- DOE (1)
- Department of Education (1)
- Employee patent rights (1)
- Etc. (1)
- Hookup culture (1)
- IP (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Intellectual property -- Universities & colleges (1)
- Inventions (1)
- Inventions -- Universities & colleges (1)
- Inventors (1)
- Issue of Effective Consent (1)
- Laws (1)
- Patent laws & legislation -- United States (1)
- Patents (1)
- Rape -- Law & legislation (1)
- Sexual assault (1)
- Sexual assault -- Universities & colleges (1)
- Sexual consent -- Standards (1)
- Standard of consent (1)
- Team production process (1)
- Technology transfer (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Education
Title Ix, Sexual Assault, And The Issue Of Effective Consent: Blurred Lines—When Should “Yes” Mean “No”?, Lori E. Shaw
Title Ix, Sexual Assault, And The Issue Of Effective Consent: Blurred Lines—When Should “Yes” Mean “No”?, Lori E. Shaw
Indiana Law Journal
This Article is intended to set the process in motion by providing the DOE and the educational institutions governed by Title IX with a proposed standard for “effective consent.” Part I provides an overview of the realities of campus life in the 2010s, delving into the root causes of sexual assault and other forms of unwanted sexual contact. Sexual hookups and binge drinking, two aspects of campus life inextricably linked to one another and to unwanted sexual contact, are explored in depth.
Part II presents an overview of the traditional role, structures, and processes of the student-conduct system. It then …
University Ip: The University As Coordinator Of The Team Production Process, Samuel Estreicher, Kristina A. Yost
University Ip: The University As Coordinator Of The Team Production Process, Samuel Estreicher, Kristina A. Yost
Indiana Law Journal
This Article focuses on intellectual property (IP) issues in the university setting. Often, universities require faculty who have been hired in whole or in part to invent to assign inventions created within the scope of their employment to the university. In addition, the most effective way to secure compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act, which deals with ownership of inventions involving federally funded research, is for the university to take title to such inventions. Failure to specify who has title can result in title passing to the government. Once the university asserts ownership, it then decides whether to process a patent …