Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Digital pedagogy (2)
- Educational technology (2)
- Academic integrity (1)
- Active learning (1)
- Attention (1)
-
- Cheating (1)
- Class policy (1)
- Course design (1)
- Distraction (1)
- Gamification (1)
- History (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Minecraft (1)
- Participation (1)
- Pedagogy (1)
- Plagiarism (1)
- South africa (1)
- Student engagement (1)
- Student motivation (1)
- Syllabus (1)
- Technology (1)
- Technology-enhanced learning (1)
- University policies (1)
- Writing (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Education
The Apparition Of These Screens In The Crowd, Trey Conatser
The Apparition Of These Screens In The Crowd, Trey Conatser
Greater Faculties: A Review of Teaching and Learning
To unpack some of our assumptions about attention, learning, and technology in the classroom, CELT's Trey Conatser spoke with Dr. Yuha Jung and Dr. Rachel Shane of the Department of Arts Administration. Jung and Shane have worked with colleagues to integrate technologies into their teaching so that students are more likely to be on task. What follows is an informal exploration of what it means to pay attention and to learn in the context of the contested value of digital technologies.
The Building Blocks Of History, Nicole Martin
The Building Blocks Of History, Nicole Martin
Greater Faculties: A Review of Teaching and Learning
Dr. Steve Davis is an Assistant Professor of History at the University of Kentucky, where he teaches precolonial and modern South African history using the popular video game Minecraft. CELT's Dr. Nicole Martin asked Dr. Davis about his goals for student learning, and how he encourages students to develop skills in historical analysis through virtual world-building.
On Cheating And Prosperity, Trey Conatser
On Cheating And Prosperity, Trey Conatser
Greater Faculties: A Review of Teaching and Learning
At the outset of a new academic year, we'd do well to reflect on how we pitch academic integrity—and the concept of cheating—to our students. Not only does it affect how they see us as teachers and scholars; it also affects in profound ways how we see (or don't see) students as complex human beings. And this asks us to go against our gut reactions to the apparent moral legibility of cheating. If we understand cheating as an evasive concept, and as a product of our institutions, we're much less likely to incentivize it.