Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Abolition of Familty (1)
- Alternative Childrearing Arrangements (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Communitarianism (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Fair Equality of Opportunity (1)
- Family (1)
- Fannie Mae (1)
- Freddie Mac (1)
- General Law (1)
- Government-sponsored enterprises (1)
- Human Nature (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- John Rawls (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Justice as Fairness (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Marxist Critique of Justice (1)
- Original Position (1)
- Plato (1)
- Politics (1)
- Pragmatism (1)
- Priority of Justice (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Quasi-government (1)
- Quasi-government, Hybrid organizations (1)
- Rousseau (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Hybrid Organizations And The Alignment Of Interests: The Case Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac, Jonathan Koppell
Hybrid Organizations And The Alignment Of Interests: The Case Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac, Jonathan Koppell
Jonathan GS Koppell
This article explores the political influence of government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs). Using Congress's overhaul of the regulatory infrastructure for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a case study, the article presents two principal findings: (1) The characteristics that distinguish government-sponsored enterprises from traditional government agencies and private companies endow Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with unique political resources; and (2) the alignment of interest groups around Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is subject to strategic manipulation by the GSEs. A triangular model of this alignment is proposed and employed to analyze the legislative outcome. The case has implications for students of …
Rights Of Inequality: Rawlsian Justice, Equal Opportunity, And The Status Of The Family, Justin Schwartz
Rights Of Inequality: Rawlsian Justice, Equal Opportunity, And The Status Of The Family, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
Is the family subject to principles of justice? In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls includes the (monogamous) family along with the market and the government as among the "basic institutions of society" to which principles of justice apply. Justice, he famously insists, is primary in politics as truth is in science: the only excuse for tolerating injustice is that no lesser injustice is possible. The point of the present paper is that Rawls doesn't actually mean this. When it comes to the family, and in particular its impact on fair equal opportunity (the first part of the the Difference …