Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law (3)
- Science (3)
- Society (3)
- Technology (3)
- Corporate governance (2)
-
- Facts (2)
- Justice (2)
- Public company (2)
- Truth (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Bilateral Investment Treaties (1)
- Business ethics (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- ChatGPT (1)
- China (1)
- Competitive Neutrality (1)
- Compliance Mechanisms (1)
- Compliance auditing (1)
- Contract law (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate culture (1)
- Corporate power (1)
- Corporate purpose (1)
- Corporation law (1)
- Critical librarianship (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Disclosure authorities (1)
- Disclosure of information (1)
- Diversity in the workplace (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
A Critical Librarianship Approach For Teaching Patent Searching: Who Becomes An Inventor In America?, Dave Zwicky, Ilana Stonebraker
A Critical Librarianship Approach For Teaching Patent Searching: Who Becomes An Inventor In America?, Dave Zwicky, Ilana Stonebraker
Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research
The ways in which a technology is invented, owned, and approved are strongly influenced by the same oppressive and exclusionary structures that critical librarianship interrogates. Patents, limited-term grants of rights to inventions, are issued to inventors in exchange for detailed specifications of the invention. This paper examines current practices used by business librarians in teaching students how to find patents and how these practices could be critically informed given the nature of the United States patent system as it exists today. An output of this work is a suggested lesson plan with recommended resources.
Lendingpoint Consolidated, Inc., Et. Al. V. Bdo Usa, Llp, Et. Al., Order On Motions To Dismiss, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Lendingpoint Consolidated, Inc., Et. Al. V. Bdo Usa, Llp, Et. Al., Order On Motions To Dismiss, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Bernard Parks, Jr., Et. Al. V. Kelly King Et Al., Order On Cross Motions For Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiffs' Claims Against Defendants, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Saint Joseph Health System, Et. Al. V. Emory Healthcare, Inc., Et Al., Order On Cross Motions For Summary Judgment, John J. Goger
Saint Joseph Health System, Et. Al. V. Emory Healthcare, Inc., Et Al., Order On Cross Motions For Summary Judgment, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
James C. Robinson, Et. Al., Fisherbroyles, Llp, Et. Al., Order Denying Motions To Exclude Market Value Opinions, Eric A. Richardson
James C. Robinson, Et. Al., Fisherbroyles, Llp, Et. Al., Order Denying Motions To Exclude Market Value Opinions, Eric A. Richardson
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
James C. Robinson, Et. Al. V. Fisherbroyles, Llp, Et. Al., Order On Plaintiff's Motion For Sanctions, Eric A. Richardson
James C. Robinson, Et. Al. V. Fisherbroyles, Llp, Et. Al., Order On Plaintiff's Motion For Sanctions, Eric A. Richardson
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Elba Liquefaction Co., Et. Al. V. Ihi E&C Int'l Corp., Fourth Amended Case Mgmt Order, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Elba Liquefaction Co., Et. Al. V. Ihi E&C Int'l Corp., Fourth Amended Case Mgmt Order, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
What’S Scope 3 Good For?, Madison Condon
What’S Scope 3 Good For?, Madison Condon
Faculty Scholarship
Opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) new rule on updated climate risk reporting has focused on one category of disclosures as particularly objectionable: Scope 3 emissions.7 Otherwise known as “supply chain emissions,” Scope 3 emissions have been voluntarily reported by a growing number of companies since the term was invented as part of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol in 2001.8 They include all the emissions both up and downstream of a corporations’ own activities: the emissions of the privately-owned factory that produced the shoes Target sells, as well as the emissions you burn while driving to the …
Fuqua Bcde Peachtree Corners Project Owner V. Ordner Construction Co., Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Wesley B. Tailor
Fuqua Bcde Peachtree Corners Project Owner V. Ordner Construction Co., Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Wesley B. Tailor
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motions For Summary Judgment, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motions For Summary Judgment, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Exclude Testimony, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Defendants' Motion To Exclude Testimony, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Company.Com, Llc V. Priority Payment Systems, Llc, Order On Motion For Interlocutory Injunction And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Company.Com, Llc V. Priority Payment Systems, Llc, Order On Motion For Interlocutory Injunction And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motion To Withdraw Admissions, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Motion To Withdraw Admissions, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alder Opportunity Lp, Et. Al. V. Cgc Capital Partners, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Pending Motions, Wesley B. Tailor
Alder Opportunity Lp, Et. Al. V. Cgc Capital Partners, Llc, Et. Al., Order On Pending Motions, Wesley B. Tailor
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
North Atlanta Vascular Clinic V. Dr. Thomas Matthews, M.D., Order On Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment, Eric A. Richardson
North Atlanta Vascular Clinic V. Dr. Thomas Matthews, M.D., Order On Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment, Eric A. Richardson
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Ahs International, Llc V. Assembly Atlanta, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion For Leave To Amend For Attorney's Fees, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Ahs International, Llc V. Assembly Atlanta, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion For Leave To Amend For Attorney's Fees, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Tidewater Fleet Supply, Llc V. Jason L. Mccard, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Tidewater Fleet Supply, Llc V. Jason L. Mccard, Et. Al., Order On Defendant's Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Greensky, Llc V. Wellness Program Services, Llc Dba Trusii, Et. Al., Order And Judgment, John J. Goger
Greensky, Llc V. Wellness Program Services, Llc Dba Trusii, Et. Al., Order And Judgment, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Counterclaim Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Bernard Parks, Et. Al. V. Kelly King, Et. Al., Ordr On Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Bernard Parks, Et. Al. V. Kelly King, Et. Al., Ordr On Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment And Motion To Dismiss, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Discovery Issues, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Galaxy Next Gen. V. Elhert, Order On Discovery Issues, Kelly L. Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Objection To Subpoena For Deposition, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Objection To Subpoena For Deposition, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Plaintiff's Motion To Compel And Motion For Contempt, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Alexander S. Glover, Et. Al. V. Georgia Mining Ventures, Llc, Order On Plaintiff's Motion To Compel And Motion For Contempt, Kelly Lee Ellerbe
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. V. Cede & Co., Et. Al., Order On Remand And Defendant's Motion To Reconsider Sanctions, John J. Goger
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. V. Cede & Co., Et. Al., Order On Remand And Defendant's Motion To Reconsider Sanctions, John J. Goger
Georgia Business Court Opinions
No abstract provided.
Disclosure Procedure, Andrew K. Jennings
Disclosure Procedure, Andrew K. Jennings
Faculty Articles
Securities disclosure is a human process. Each year, public companies collectively spend over fifteen million hours producing disclosures that undergird an equities market with tens of trillions in market capitalization. The procedures they follow in doing so affect whether their disclosures contain misstatements or omissions—errors that can cause trading losses for investors, and litigation for issuers. Yet despite the importance of the disclosures that firms produce, the literature says little about how they do it, including whether they are spending too much, too little, or just enough on their disclosure procedures. To fill that gap, this Article uses original surveys …
Is "Public Company" Still A Viable Regulatory Category?, George S. Georgiev
Is "Public Company" Still A Viable Regulatory Category?, George S. Georgiev
Faculty Articles
This Article suggests that the ubiquitous “public company” regulatory category, as currently constructed, has outlived its effectiveness in fulfilling core goals of the modern administrative state. An ever-expanding array of federal economic regulation hinges on public company status, but “public company” differs from most other regulatory categories in that it requires an affirmative opt-in by the subject entity. In practice, firms today become subject to public company regulation only if they need access to the public capital markets, which is much less of a business imperative than it once was due to the proliferation of private financing options. Paradoxically, then, …
Corporate Foreign Policy In War, Kishanthi Parella
Corporate Foreign Policy In War, Kishanthi Parella
Scholarly Articles
On February 24, 2022, Russian troops invaded Ukraine. Over a year later, the war has claimed tens of thousands of lives and led to the displacement of millions. In Spring 2023, both Ukrainian and Russian forces prepared new offensives, while the United States committed to providing Ukraine with military tanks—a move that Russian officials had previously warned would constitute direct involvement in the war. While countries debated how to respond, we also witnessed the privatization of foreign policy as hundreds of companies around the world similarly sought to assist Ukraine or punish Russia using the tools of national foreign policy—humanitarian …
The Public’S Companies, Andrew K. Jennings
The Public’S Companies, Andrew K. Jennings
Faculty Articles
This Essay uses a series of survey studies to consider how public understandings of public and private companies map into urgent debates over the role of the corporation in American society. Does a social-media company, for example, owe it to its users to follow the free-speech principles embodied in the First Amendment? May corporate managers pursue environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) policies that could reduce short-term or long-term profits? How should companies respond to political pushback against their approaches to free expression or ESG?
The studies’ results are consistent with understandings that both public and private companies have greater public …
Public Reporting Of Monitorship Outcomes, Veronica Root Martinez
Public Reporting Of Monitorship Outcomes, Veronica Root Martinez
Faculty Scholarship
When a corporation engages in misconduct that is widespread or pervasive, courts, regulators, or prosecutors often insist that the firm obtain assistance from an independent third party — a monitor — to oversee the firm’s remediation effort. The largest firms in the world — from Deutsche Bank, to Volkswagen, to Carnival Cruise Lines — have found themselves having to retain a monitor for corporate misconduct, despite attempts to avoid a monitorship entirely. Traditionally, monitors, or their special master forebearers, were utilized by courts to assist in overseeing compliance with court orders, and their work was both accessible and transparent. As …