Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bruno (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Class Actions (1)
- Comisión de Derechos Humanos (1)
- Complex Litigation (1)
-
- Contencioso (1)
- Contribuciones (1)
- Costantini (1)
- Dispute Resolution (1)
- Fiscal (1)
- García (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Lauro (1)
- Ley (1)
- Memorias (1)
- Memorias de la OPAM (1)
- OPAM (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Presentaciones (1)
- Primer Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autónomos (1)
- Procedimiento (1)
- Torts (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Ley Federal Del Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo., Bruno L. Costantini García
Ley Federal Del Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo., Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Ponencia sobre la Ley Federal del Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo, impartida por Bruno L. Costantini García.
Primer Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Primer Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Memorias del Primer Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autonomos
Offer-Of-Judgment Rules And Civil Litigation: An Empirical Study Of Automobile Insurance Litigation In The East, Tom Baker, Albert H. Yoon
Offer-Of-Judgment Rules And Civil Litigation: An Empirical Study Of Automobile Insurance Litigation In The East, Tom Baker, Albert H. Yoon
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Aggregation On The Couch: The Strategic Uses Of Ambiguity And Hypocrisy, Stephen B. Burbank
Aggregation On The Couch: The Strategic Uses Of Ambiguity And Hypocrisy, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, Professor Burbank comments on the essays by Professors Nagareda and Issacharoff. Welcoming the opportunity to revisit the interplay between procedure and substantive law and the question of democratic accountability that Professor Nagareda’s essay presents, Professor Burbank concludes that the parts of that essay are greater than the whole. He finds that Professor Nagareda’s pursuit of unifying themes and a general normative theory leads to inconsistencies in classification between procedure and substance and to an impoverished vision of institutional legitimacy. Professor Burbank voices concern that this quest, which is also evident in the current draft of the American …