Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Business Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Business

Takeover Defenses, Golden Parachutes, And Bargaining Over Stochastic Synergy Gains: A Note On Optimal Contracting, Atreya Chakraborty May 2008

Takeover Defenses, Golden Parachutes, And Bargaining Over Stochastic Synergy Gains: A Note On Optimal Contracting, Atreya Chakraborty

Atreya Chakraborty

We incorporate managerial risk aversion and stochasticity of takeover synergy gains into Harris’ (Harris, E.G. 1990. Antitakeover measures, golden parachutes, and target firm shareholder welfare. Rand Journal of Economics 21, no. 4 : 614–25.) bargaining model for the coexistence of antitakeover defenses and golden parachutes in corporate charters.We show that: (i) it is not always optimal that the target-firm shareholders adopt antitakeover defenses, (ii) the size of the golden parachute is proportional to the riskiness of the synergistic gains, and (iii) the target-firm shareholders are unequivocally better-off with golden parachutes than takeover-contingent stock options.


Golden Parachutes And Shark Repellents And Shareholders' Interests: Some New Evidence, Atreya Chakraborty Jan 2008

Golden Parachutes And Shark Repellents And Shareholders' Interests: Some New Evidence, Atreya Chakraborty

Atreya Chakraborty

In this paper we test for the motives for adopting golden parachutes and Anti-Takeover Amendments (ATAs). Firms that exhibited financial characteristics that were associated with a greater probability of hostile raids were also more likely to adopt golden parachutes or ATAs. We also find evidence to support the hypothesis that the adoption of golden parachutes and poison pills may in fact complement each other.


Corporate Governance Mechanisms And Performance Related Ceo Turnover, Atreya Chakraborty, Shahbaz A. Sheikh Dec 2007

Corporate Governance Mechanisms And Performance Related Ceo Turnover, Atreya Chakraborty, Shahbaz A. Sheikh

Atreya Chakraborty

This study investigates the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on performance related turnover. Our results indicate that smaller boards and institutional block holders are positively related to the likelihood of performance related turnover. CEOs that also hold the position of the chairman of the board or belong to a founding family face lower likelihood of turnover. CEO stock ownership is negatively related to turnover and CEOs who own 3 percent or more of their company stock face a significantly lower likelihood of performance related turnover. Moreover, protection from external control market has no effect either on the likelihood of turnover.