Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Clinical Trials (3)
- Human Experimentation (3)
- Placebos (2)
- Randomized Controlled Trials (2)
- Research Subjects (2)
-
- Researcher-Subject Relations (2)
- Risk Assessment (2)
- Biomedical Research (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Consumer Participation (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- Cultural Diversity (1)
- Developing Countries (1)
- Emergency Medical Services (1)
- Ethical Relativism (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Informed Consent (1)
- Intensive Care Units (1)
- Internationality (1)
- Medical Ethics (1)
- Placebo (1)
- Policy Making (1)
- Procreative Ethics (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Referral and Consultation (1)
- Research Ethics (1)
- Risk Factors (1)
- Therapeutic Human Experimentation (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy
Heads Or Tails: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials, Charles Weijer
Heads Or Tails: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials, Charles Weijer
Charles Weijer
No abstract provided.
Waiver Of Consent For Emergency Research, Andrew Mcrae, Charles Weijer
Waiver Of Consent For Emergency Research, Andrew Mcrae, Charles Weijer
Charles Weijer
No abstract provided.
When Are Research Risks Reasonable In Relation To Anticipated Benefits?, Charles Weijer, Paul Miller
When Are Research Risks Reasonable In Relation To Anticipated Benefits?, Charles Weijer, Paul Miller
Charles Weijer
The question "When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits?" is at the heart of disputes in the ethics of clinical research. Institutional review boards are often criticized for inconsistent decision-making, a problem that is compounded by a number of contemporary controversies, including the ethics of research involving placebo controls, developing countries, incapable adults and emergency rooms. If this pressing ethical question is to be addressed in a principled way, then a systematic approach to the ethics of risk in research is required. Component analysis provides such a systematic approach.
The Quest For Legitimacy: Comment On Cox Macpherson's 'To Strengthen Consensus, Consult The Stakeholders', Charles Weijer
The Quest For Legitimacy: Comment On Cox Macpherson's 'To Strengthen Consensus, Consult The Stakeholders', Charles Weijer
Charles Weijer
No abstract provided.
The Ethical Analysis Of Risk In Intensive Care Unit Research, Charles Weijer
The Ethical Analysis Of Risk In Intensive Care Unit Research, Charles Weijer
Charles Weijer
Research in the intensive care unit (ICU) is commonly thought to pose 'serious risk' to study participants. This perception may be at the root of a variety of impediments to the conduct of clinical trials in the ICU setting. Component analysis offers a promising approach to the ethical analysis of ICU research. Because clinical trials commonly involve a mixture of study interventions, therapeutic and nontherapeutic procedures must be analyzed separately. Therapeutic procedures must meet the requirement of clinical equipoise. Risks associated with nontherapeutic procedures must be minimized consistent with sound scientific design, and be deemed reasonable in relation to the …
Center For Professional Ethics, Spring 2004, Case Western Reserve University
Center For Professional Ethics, Spring 2004, Case Western Reserve University
Center for Professional Ethics
Table of Contents:
- Bonhoefer and King: Legacies and Lessons
- An Extraordinary Man: Case Celebrates Martin Luther King, Jr.
- It's About Ethics: An Interview with Robert P. Lawry
- Current Ethical Controversies in Internal Research: A Talk by Ruth Maklin
- Director's Corner: Civic Duty, Civic Courage by Robert P. Lawry
- News and Notes
Moral Callings And The Duty To Have Children: A Response To Jeff Mitchell, James Mcbain
Moral Callings And The Duty To Have Children: A Response To Jeff Mitchell, James Mcbain
Faculty Submissions
Jeff Mitchell argues that the good reason for having children is that parenthood is a “moral calling” and that one should heed the call out of a sense of duty and responsibility for the good of society. I argue such a “moral calling” account is mistaken, first, in that Mitchell problematically assumes the “basic intuition” is mistaken and, second, it fails to provide the epistemic conditions for the warranted belief that one would probably make a good parent (a central consideration of Mitchell’s). Thus, such a “moral calling” rationale for the having of children is not superior to rationales that …
Ethics And The 21st Century University, Judith Bailey
Ethics And The 21st Century University, Judith Bailey
Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Papers
Papers presented for the Center of the Study of Ethics in Society Western Michigan University
Rosenzweig's Messianic Aesthetics, Jules Simon