Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 100th Battalion (1)
- 442nd (1)
- Alice Kamokila Campbell (1)
- Archives (1)
- Asian American (1)
-
- Cambodia (1)
- Cold War (1)
- Colonization (1)
- Congress (1)
- Cultural internationalism Iraq (1)
- Cultural nationalism (1)
- Daniel Inouye (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Hawaii (1)
- History (1)
- Horizontal Oppression (1)
- Imperialism (1)
- Inalienability (1)
- Indigenous (1)
- Japanese (1)
- Japanese American (1)
- Japanese Internment (1)
- Military Intelligence Service (1)
- Native (1)
- Native Hawaiian (1)
- Oahu (1)
- Perpetual Foreigner (1)
- Persecution (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Public History
Sovereignty, Statehood, And Subjugation: Native Hawaiian And Japanese American Discourse Over Hawaiian Statehood, Nicole Saito
Sovereignty, Statehood, And Subjugation: Native Hawaiian And Japanese American Discourse Over Hawaiian Statehood, Nicole Saito
Student Scholar Symposium Abstracts and Posters
Although discourse over Hawaiian statehood has increasingly been described by scholars as a racial conflict between Japanese Americans and Native Hawaiians, there existed a broad spectrum of interactions between the two groups. Both communities were forced to confront the prejudices they had against each other while recognizing their shared experiences with discrimination, creating a paradoxical political culture of competition and solidarity up until the conclusion of World War Two. From 1946 to 1950, however, the country’s collective understanding of Japanese American citizenship began to shift with recognition of the community’s military service record and an increased proportion of veterans elected …
Ba'ath Party Archives And The Khmer Rouge Records: The Importance Of Cultural Accessibility, Elizabeth M. Thompson
Ba'ath Party Archives And The Khmer Rouge Records: The Importance Of Cultural Accessibility, Elizabeth M. Thompson
Honors Projects
This paper contrasts the handling, provenance, and application of the Ba’ath Party Archives with that of the Cambodian Khmer Rouge Records. While similar in many facets, the events surrounding the Ba’ath Party Archives received heavy ridicule while the international community largely supported the handling of the Khmer Rouge records. The comparison of the Cambodian and Iraqi case studies’ distinct differences reveal why international opinion varies. It also emphasizes a gap within standard understanding concerning archival law and practices. This exploration will reveal that current archival dialogue focuses too much on a dichotomous relationship between international and national concerns. The author …