Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
On Being Objective: Hard Data, Soft Data And Baseball., Michael A. Gilbert
On Being Objective: Hard Data, Soft Data And Baseball., Michael A. Gilbert
OSSA Conference Archive
“Objective” is a term that has a long and sometimes tumultuous history and a wide range of meanings. The sense in which I am interested here is the one that refers to ways of thinking, and especially the explicit criticism of an argument or judgment as not being “objective,” as exemplified in the following.
- You’re not being objective.
- You have to look at it objectively.
- Objectively, the best choice is…
- Being objective, I’d have to say…
Implicit in these statements is an ideology that denigrates emotion and other communicative aspects in favour of an idealized sense of fact, data and …
Normative Argumentation Theory Without Fundamental Principles, Eugen Octav Popa
Normative Argumentation Theory Without Fundamental Principles, Eugen Octav Popa
OSSA Conference Archive
In this paper I develop and defend a form of argumentative normativity that is not based on fundamental principles. I first argue that research agendas that aim to discover (or claimed to have discovered) fundamental principles of ‘good’ argumentative discourse share one crucial weak spot, viz. circularity. I then argue that this weak spot can be avoided in a pancritical (Bartley, 1984) view of normativity.
Towards Computer Support For Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Analysis, Jacky Visser
Towards Computer Support For Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Analysis, Jacky Visser
OSSA Conference Archive
Computer tools are increasingly used to support the analysis of argumentative texts. Generic support for argumentation analysis is helpful, but catering to the requirements of specific theoretical approaches has additional advantages. Although the pragma-dialectical method of analyzing argumentative texts is widely used, no dedicated computational support tools exist. An outline is presented for the development of such tools, that starts with the formal approximation of the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion.