Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (619)
- Criminal Law (401)
- Criminal Procedure (226)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (116)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (107)
-
- Courts (74)
- Constitutional Law (70)
- Legal Studies (69)
- Law and Society (68)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (66)
- Law and Race (49)
- Sociology (44)
- Judges (42)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (35)
- Legislation (33)
- Criminology (32)
- Juvenile Law (31)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (31)
- State and Local Government Law (31)
- Jurisprudence (30)
- Law and Psychology (27)
- Supreme Court of the United States (23)
- Evidence (22)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (21)
- Psychology (19)
- Law and Economics (18)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (18)
- Law and Politics (17)
- Law and Gender (16)
- Fourteenth Amendment (13)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (87)
- Selected Works (38)
- SelectedWorks (38)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (33)
- University of Missouri School of Law (24)
-
- Fordham Law School (20)
- University of Colorado Law School (17)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (16)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- St. Mary's University (13)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (10)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (10)
- Southern Methodist University (10)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (10)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- University of Richmond (9)
- Boston University School of Law (8)
- Cleveland State University (8)
- University of Denver (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- University of Kentucky (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (7)
- Walden University (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (6)
- University of Baltimore Law (6)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (43)
- Michigan Law Review (34)
- Articles (30)
- Faculty Publications (29)
- Faculty Scholarship (18)
-
- Publications (18)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (17)
- Fordham Law Review (12)
- Scholarly Works (12)
- Journal Articles (11)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (11)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (10)
- Pepperdine Law Review (9)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (8)
- Cleveland State Law Review (8)
- Faculty Articles (8)
- Maryland Law Review (8)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (7)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (7)
- Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies (7)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Scholarly Articles (6)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
- Georgia State University Law Review (5)
- Kentucky Law Journal (5)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (5)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (5)
- St. John's Law Review (5)
- University of Denver Criminal Law Review (5)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 691 - 707 of 707
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Penal Incarceration And Cruel And Unusual Punishment, William S. Mcaninch
Penal Incarceration And Cruel And Unusual Punishment, William S. Mcaninch
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sentencing: The Probation Officer, James Lowenthal
Sentencing: The Probation Officer, James Lowenthal
IUSTITIA
Sentencing offenders of the criminal law is a widely diverse and complex problem. Few guidelines are available for those upon whom the task has been thrust. Depending upon the jurisdiction, various parties are responsible for sentence determination: juries, administrative agencies, legislatures, and judges. Most jurisdictions, however, require the judge to make the final determination.' To aid in this determination, many jurisdictions, including federal district courts, require or permit judges to consider a presentence investigation report prepared by a professional probation officer. The use of these reports and recommendations are generally limited to felony cases or to specific crimes where probation …
Discretion In Felony Sentencing—A Study Of Influencing Factors, Barbara L. Johnston, Nicholas P. Miller, Ronald Schoenberg, Laurence Ross Weatherly
Discretion In Felony Sentencing—A Study Of Influencing Factors, Barbara L. Johnston, Nicholas P. Miller, Ronald Schoenberg, Laurence Ross Weatherly
Washington Law Review
The desirability and constitutionality of discretionary criminal sentencing can be ascertained only if the factors influencing sentencing decisions are known. The authors analyze data generated by a 1971 survey of Washington State superior court trial judges in order to identify the significant factors and to evaluate their relative importance in criminal sentencing. The results indicate that discretionary sentencing is influenced strongly by social biases in no way dependent upon the culpability of the offender, his personal behavior patterns, or circumstances of the crime.
Appellate Review Of Sentencing, Julian Glenn Dupree
Appellate Review Of Sentencing, Julian Glenn Dupree
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Authorized Dispositions Of Offenders Under The New Kentucky Penal Code, Gregory M. Bartlett
Authorized Dispositions Of Offenders Under The New Kentucky Penal Code, Gregory M. Bartlett
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pre-Sentence Reports: Utility Or Futility? A Report Of The New York City Board Of Correction, New York City Board Of Correction
Pre-Sentence Reports: Utility Or Futility? A Report Of The New York City Board Of Correction, New York City Board Of Correction
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article evaluates New York Criminal Procedure Law increasing the number of cases requiring pre-sentence investigations and reports by analyzing the consequences and benefits of pre-sentencing reports. The article focuses on the delays in the criminal justice system and urges the New York State government to undertake a comprehensive review of the criminal justice system to determine whether plea bargaining is both the most effective and efficient method of achieving the system's goals. The article then suggests interim measures to be taken to alleviate delays produced by pre-sentence investigations.
Sentencing: The Use Of Psychiatric Information And Presentence Reports, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Sentencing: The Use Of Psychiatric Information And Presentence Reports, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
It has become apparent that the two disciplines of law and psychiatry have a common "interface" in the field of criminal justice. Commentators generally agree that the administration of criminal justice is greatly aided by psychiatrists and psychiatric data. That is not to say, however, that the meeting of the disciplines has been without incident or misunderstanding. Problems have arisen because of divergent attitudes and goals of the professions. Some commentators say that the concerns of the two disciplines are not the same; others claim that much of the problem lies in the over-estimation of the certainty and reliability of …
Title X - Dangerous Special Offender Sentencing, Richard Levy
Title X - Dangerous Special Offender Sentencing, Richard Levy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Undoubtedly the most controversial new provision in the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 is title X. Title X authorizes a federal prosecuting attorney to notify the defendant and the court before trial that the defendant, if found guilty of the felony on which he is being tried, is in the prosecutor's opinion also subject to the dangerous special offender provisions embodied in the title. Should the defendant be judged guilty of the felony, he then will fall subject to an additional penalty beyond that received for the conviction if the judge finds that he qualifies as one of three …
Plea Bargaining: A Model Court Rule, Kenneth A. Kraus
Plea Bargaining: A Model Court Rule, Kenneth A. Kraus
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
It is not the purpose of this note to discuss the justification for the plea bargaining process, for it is clear that this system will of necessity be continued in the foreseeable future. Instead, this analysis is designed first to present the functional role, constitutional status and existing abuses in the plea bargaining process, and then to discuss the goals and the proposed standards relevant to reform of the present plea bargaining procedures. The culmination of this analysis is the proposed Model Court Rule for Plea Agreements in part III.
Sentencing: The Use Of Psychiatric Information And Presentence Reports, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Sentencing: The Use Of Psychiatric Information And Presentence Reports, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure For Juvenile Offenders In Ethiopia, Stanley Z. Fisher
Criminal Procedure For Juvenile Offenders In Ethiopia, Stanley Z. Fisher
Faculty Scholarship
The purpose of this article is to set out, in summary fashion, the law concerning juvenile offenders in Ethiopia. Our focus will be on procedural rather than substantive aspects-insofar as it is possible to separate the two-and particularly upon the enforcement of constitutional guarantees in the process.
Imprisonment For Nonpayment Of Fines And Costs: A New Look At The Law And The Constitution, Paul M. Stein
Imprisonment For Nonpayment Of Fines And Costs: A New Look At The Law And The Constitution, Paul M. Stein
Vanderbilt Law Review
This note is based on the premise that a new understanding of the principles of sentencing has evolved during the past half-century. After articulating this thesis, one which has been more fully developed elsewhere, an assessment is made of the extent to which the more modern concepts of sentencing have been embodied in public policy as enunciated in statutes and court decisions, particularly decisions interpreting constitutional requirements. This examination reveals tha the existing rules and practices concerning imprisonment for fines and costs reflect uneasy compromises between competing policies and that these rules and practices are largely holdovers from an earlier …
The Concept Of Treatment In The Criminal Law, Sol Rubin
The Concept Of Treatment In The Criminal Law, Sol Rubin
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure--Constitutional Limitations On Imposition Of More Severe Sentence After Conviction Upon Retrial, W. Stokes Harris Jr.
Criminal Procedure--Constitutional Limitations On Imposition Of More Severe Sentence After Conviction Upon Retrial, W. Stokes Harris Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Appellate Review Of Legal But Excessive Sentences: A Comparative Study, Gerhard O.W. Mueller, Fre Le Poole
Appellate Review Of Legal But Excessive Sentences: A Comparative Study, Gerhard O.W. Mueller, Fre Le Poole
Vanderbilt Law Review
Classical penology was conceived in France in the eighteenth century, and then eclipsed all over the world in the nineteenth, when Lombroso conjured up the picture of the born criminal. It was finally laid to rest in the United States in the twentieth century. Its basic tenet had been simple enough: the legislature in its infinite wisdom would seek and find the appropriate punishment for every crime.This can be accomplished if a crime is defined narrowly enough, perhaps by the creation of subcategories of that crime, so as to encompass all potential perpetrators who will each incur the same amount …
Federal Procedure - Habeas Corpus - The Preliminary Doctrine - Rowe V. Peyton, 383 F.2d 709 (4th Cir. 1967)
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Model Penal Code: Sentencing, Probation And Parole, Roy Mitchell Moreland
Model Penal Code: Sentencing, Probation And Parole, Roy Mitchell Moreland
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.