Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Wollongong

2020

Comparison

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Triboelectric Nanogenerator Versus Piezoelectric Generator At Low Frequency (<4 Hz): A Quantitative Comparison, Abdelsalam Ahmed, Islam Hassan, Ahmed Helal, Vitor Sencadas, Ali Radhi, Chang Jeong, Maher El-Kady Jan 2020

Triboelectric Nanogenerator Versus Piezoelectric Generator At Low Frequency (<4 Hz): A Quantitative Comparison, Abdelsalam Ahmed, Islam Hassan, Ahmed Helal, Vitor Sencadas, Ali Radhi, Chang Jeong, Maher El-Kady

Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part B

© 2020 The Author(s) Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) and piezoelectric generators (PGs) are generally considered the two most common approaches for harvesting ambient mechanical energy that is ubiquitous in our everyday life. The main difference between the two generators lies in their respective working frequency range. Despite the remarkable progress, there has been no quantitative studies on the operating frequency band of the two generators at frequency values below 4 Hz, typical of human motion. Here, the two generators are systematically compared based on their energy harvesting capabilities below 4 Hz. Unlike PGs, the TENG demonstrates higher power performance and is …