Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication Year
Articles 31 - 60 of 512
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Civil Jury And American Democracy, Paul D. Carrington
The Civil Jury And American Democracy, Paul D. Carrington
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law
No abstract provided.
When Is A Principal Charged With An Agent’S Knowledge?, Deborah A. Demott
When Is A Principal Charged With An Agent’S Knowledge?, Deborah A. Demott
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law
No abstract provided.
Drug Wars In Black And White, Joseph E. Kennedy
Drug Wars In Black And White, Joseph E. Kennedy
Law and Contemporary Problems
The debate over the racial complexion of the war against drugs often devolves into a clash of fundamental assumptions that are difficult to either validate or refute. Ultimately, however, the criminal justice system is destined to find crime only where it looks for crime.
Study Habits: Probing Modern Attempts To Assess Minority Offender Disproportionality, Sharon L. Davies
Study Habits: Probing Modern Attempts To Assess Minority Offender Disproportionality, Sharon L. Davies
Law and Contemporary Problems
Oregon, Washington and Utah have recently taken empirical steps to assess the extent to which minorities are overrepresented in their respective criminal justice systems and to seek out the root causes of any overrepresentation observed. Davies contrasts and critiques the disparate analytical approaches utilized by these states and offers some thoughts about how people might improve the chances of success of future similar efforts.
From The Ne’Er-Do-Well To The Criminal History Category: The Refinement Of The Actuarial Model In Criminal Law, Bernard E. Harcourt
From The Ne’Er-Do-Well To The Criminal History Category: The Refinement Of The Actuarial Model In Criminal Law, Bernard E. Harcourt
Law and Contemporary Problems
Harcourt discusses three developments in 20th century criminal law: the evolution of parole board decision-making in the early 20th century, the development of fixed sentencing guidelines in the late 20th century, and the growth of criminal profiling as a formal law enforcement tool since the 1960s. In each of these case studies, he focuses on the criminal law decision-making.
Judicial Selection In Alaska: Justifications And Proposed Courses Of Reform, Tillman J. Finley
Judicial Selection In Alaska: Justifications And Proposed Courses Of Reform, Tillman J. Finley
Alaska Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overcoming The Myth Of Free Will In Criminal Law: The True Impact Of The Genetic Revolution, Matthew Jones
Overcoming The Myth Of Free Will In Criminal Law: The True Impact Of The Genetic Revolution, Matthew Jones
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Copyright As A Rule Of Evidence, Douglas Lichtman
Copyright As A Rule Of Evidence, Douglas Lichtman
Duke Law Journal
Many copyright doctrines serve to exclude from the copyright regime cases particularly prone to evidentiary complexity. The implicit logic is that, for these cases, the social costs of litigation would likely outweigh the social benefits derived from offering copyright protection in the first place. Doctrines that serve this evidentiary function include some doctrines for which an evidentiary purpose is readily apparent (for example, the requirement that eligible works be fixed in tangible form), and some for which the link is quite subtle (for example, the rule against protecting work that lacks creativity). Understanding these doctrines in this light helps to …
Deliberative Democracy’S Attempt To Turn Politics Into Law, Christopher H. Schroeder
Deliberative Democracy’S Attempt To Turn Politics Into Law, Christopher H. Schroeder
Law and Contemporary Problems
Deliberative democracy is one of the most discussed contemporary political theories. Schroeder argues that its central claim can be understood as the claim that politics needs to become more like law. While specific recommendations to make specific decision processes more deliberative are fair, the attempt to efface the distinctively non-lawlike attributes of politics entirely cannot withstand scrutiny.
Deliberation Disconnected: What It Takes To Improve Civic Competence, Arthur Lupia
Deliberation Disconnected: What It Takes To Improve Civic Competence, Arthur Lupia
Law and Contemporary Problems
Lupia argues that the suggestions of those who advocate deliberative democracy to incorporate more and more law-like precepts into politics will not achieve the ultimate ambition of deliberative theory, which is to have the resolution of disputes turn on nothing but the force of the better argument. Lupia discusses mechanisms to build civic competence by creating conditions in which the better argument has an improved change of winning the battle.
Deliberative Democracy And Campaign Finance Reform, Neil Kinkopf
Deliberative Democracy And Campaign Finance Reform, Neil Kinkopf
Law and Contemporary Problems
Deliberative theory is concerned with the problem of dissensus and justification--the exercise of state power is justified through a process of public reasoning. Kinkopf examines deliberative theory and illustrates its problems through the campaign finance reform debate.
The Bill Of Rights And The Emerging Democracies, Jacek Kurczewski, Barry Sullivan
The Bill Of Rights And The Emerging Democracies, Jacek Kurczewski, Barry Sullivan
Law and Contemporary Problems
Today, the influence of the US Bill of Rights can be traced through its remote offspring, including the Helsinki Agreement, the German Basic Law, the post-war French constitutions, and the European Convention on Human Rights. These documents have influenced recent developments in the emerging democracies of eastern and central Europe.
Situating Liberalism In Transnational Legal Space, Don Suh
Situating Liberalism In Transnational Legal Space, Don Suh
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law
No abstract provided.
Postcommunist Charters Of Rights In Europe And The U.S. Bill Of Rights, Wojciech Sadurski
Postcommunist Charters Of Rights In Europe And The U.S. Bill Of Rights, Wojciech Sadurski
Law and Contemporary Problems
The Bill of Rights of the US Constitution served as both a model and anti-model for the constitutionalization of citizens' rights in the new democracies emerging after the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe. The most striking contrast between the US Bill of Rights and postcommunist constitutional charters of rights is the absence in the former, and the inclusion in the latter, of catalogues of so-called "positive," socioeconomic rights.
Whither Securities Regulation? Some Behavioral Observations Regarding Proposals For Its Future, Robert Prentice
Whither Securities Regulation? Some Behavioral Observations Regarding Proposals For Its Future, Robert Prentice
Duke Law Journal
Respected commentators have floated several proposals for startling reforms of America's seventy-year-old securities regulation scheme. Many involve substantial deregulation with a view toward allowing issuers and investors to contract privately for desired levels of disclosure and fraud protection. The behavioral literature explored in this Article cautions that in a deregulated securities world it is exceedingly optimistic to expect issuers voluntarily to disclose optimal levels of information, securities intermediaries such as stock exchanges and stockbrokers to appropriately consider the interests of investors, or investors to be able to bargain efficiently for fraud protection.
Rational Expectations Of Leniency: Implicit Plea Agreements And The Prosecutor’S Role As A Minister Of Justice, Eli Paul Mazur
Rational Expectations Of Leniency: Implicit Plea Agreements And The Prosecutor’S Role As A Minister Of Justice, Eli Paul Mazur
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Feminist Look At The Death Penalty, Amy E. Pope
A Feminist Look At The Death Penalty, Amy E. Pope
Law and Contemporary Problems
Pope gives an exploration of the need for a feminist perspective on capital punishment. She then begins to determine which feminist methodology is most appropriate to an analysis of the death penalty.
Presidential Management Of The Administrative State: The Not-So-Unitary Executive, Robert V. Percival
Presidential Management Of The Administrative State: The Not-So-Unitary Executive, Robert V. Percival
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Statistics, Not Experts, William Meadow, Cass R. Sunstein
Statistics, Not Experts, William Meadow, Cass R. Sunstein
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Too Many Probabilities: Statistical Evidence Of Tort Causation, David W. Barnes
Too Many Probabilities: Statistical Evidence Of Tort Causation, David W. Barnes
Law and Contemporary Problems
Medical scientific testimony is often expressed in terms of two different probabilities: 1. The increased probability of harm if a person is exposed, for example, to a toxin. 2. The observed relationship is an artifact of the experimental method. This article demonstrates that neither probability, taken alone or together, measures whether the "preponderance of the evidence" test is met.
Scientific Models Of Human Health Risk Analysis In Legal And Policy Decisions, Douglas Crawford-Brown
Scientific Models Of Human Health Risk Analysis In Legal And Policy Decisions, Douglas Crawford-Brown
Law and Contemporary Problems
The quality of scientific predictions of risk in the courtroom and policy arena rests in large measure on how the two differences between normal practice and the legal/policy practice of science are reconciled. This article considers a variety of issues that arise in reconciling these differences, and the problems that remain with scientific estimates of risk when these are used in decisions.
Culture And Causality: Non-Western Systems Of Explanation, William M. O'Barr
Culture And Causality: Non-Western Systems Of Explanation, William M. O'Barr
Law and Contemporary Problems
The logic of some other systems of thought, explanation, and prediction are discussed, in order to find what can be learned about the sociocultural contexts and their functions in other cultures. The truths they may represent are about the human quest to understand causes and effects.
Congress As Culprit: How Lawmakers Spurred On The Court’S Anti-Congress Crusade, Neal Devins
Congress As Culprit: How Lawmakers Spurred On The Court’S Anti-Congress Crusade, Neal Devins
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Swine Flu Vaccine And Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Study In Relative Risk And Specific Causation, David A. Freedman, Philip B. Stark
The Swine Flu Vaccine And Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Study In Relative Risk And Specific Causation, David A. Freedman, Philip B. Stark
Law and Contemporary Problems
This article discusses the role of epidemiologic evidence in toxic tort cases, focusing on relative risk. Whether specific causation can be inferred if a relative risk is above 2.0 is discussed. The object is to explore the scientific logic behind intuitions of relative risk.
Scientific Ignorance And Reliable Patterns Of Evidence In Toxic Tort Causation: Is There A Need For Liability Reform?, Carl F. Cranor, David A. Eastmond
Scientific Ignorance And Reliable Patterns Of Evidence In Toxic Tort Causation: Is There A Need For Liability Reform?, Carl F. Cranor, David A. Eastmond
Law and Contemporary Problems
As a first step to preserving the central aims of tort law, courts will need to recognize the wide variety of respectable, reliable patterns of evidence on which scientists themselves rely for drawing inferences about the toxicity of substances. Courts may also need to take further steps to address the woeful ignorance about the chemical universe. This may necessitate changes in the liability rules.
Causation And The Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency, And Causal Sufficiency, Richard Fumerton, Ken Kress
Causation And The Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency, And Causal Sufficiency, Richard Fumerton, Ken Kress
Law and Contemporary Problems
This article briefly describes the normative/nonnormative distinction, and how one might invoke this distinction to locate a nonnormative dimension of actual causation. After briefly introducing Richard Wright's concept of a necessary element in a set of conditions for an effect, the article notes ambiguities in the critical concepts of necessity and sufficiency that he deploys. The article suggests the most plausible interpretation of Wright's use of different modal concepts.
Narratives Of Federalism: Of Continuities And Comparative Constitutional Experience, Vicki C. Jackson
Narratives Of Federalism: Of Continuities And Comparative Constitutional Experience, Vicki C. Jackson
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The New Deal Constitution In Exile, William E. Forbath
The New Deal Constitution In Exile, William E. Forbath
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Of Cherries, Fudge, And Onions: Science And Its Courtroom Perversion, David W. Peterson, John M. Conley
Of Cherries, Fudge, And Onions: Science And Its Courtroom Perversion, David W. Peterson, John M. Conley
Law and Contemporary Problems
The thesis of this article is that the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s focus on the scientific method, however rigorously applied, invites certain classes of abuses. There are instances in which evidence can be made to look more scientific by a process that in fact and substance makes is utterly unscientific.
Contingent Fees And Tort Reform: A Reassessment And Reality Check, Elihu Inselbuch
Contingent Fees And Tort Reform: A Reassessment And Reality Check, Elihu Inselbuch
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.