Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- BLR (35)
- UIC School of Law (20)
- Suffolk University (16)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- SelectedWorks (8)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (5)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (5)
- University of New Mexico (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Selected Works (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Keyword
-
- Practice and Procedure (37)
- Litigation (25)
- Courts (15)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (12)
-
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Law and Society (11)
- General Law (10)
- Judges (10)
- Dispute Resolution (9)
- Evidence (9)
- Law and Economics (9)
- Economics (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Commercial Law (6)
- Conflict of Laws (6)
- Dispute resolution (6)
- Environmental Law (6)
- International Law (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Torts (6)
- Civil Law (5)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- Corporations (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (35)
- UIC Law Review (20)
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (16)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Faculty Publications (10)
-
- Publications (9)
- Articles (8)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (6)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Materials from All Student Organizations (4)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Buffalo Law Review (3)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Bruno L. Costantini García (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (2)
- Gabriel Martinez Medrano (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Archived Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 195
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
From The Wrong End Of The Telescope: A Response To Professor David Bernstein, Aaron D. Twerski, Margaret Berger
From The Wrong End Of The Telescope: A Response To Professor David Bernstein, Aaron D. Twerski, Margaret Berger
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
From The Wrong End Of The Telescope: A Response To Professor David Bernstein, Margaret A. Berger, Aaron D. Twerski
From The Wrong End Of The Telescope: A Response To Professor David Bernstein, Margaret A. Berger, Aaron D. Twerski
Michigan Law Review
On the pages of this law review, in an article entitled Uncertainty and Informed Choice: Unmasking Daubert, the authors argued for the recognition of a new product liability cause of action when drug companies fail to warn about uncertain risks attendant to the use of non-therapeutic drugs whose purpose is to enhance lifestyle. We noted that in the post-Daubert era, plaintiffs have faced increasing difficulty in proving that a given toxic agent was causally responsible for the injuries suffered after ingesting a drug. That plaintiffs cannot overcome the barriers to proving injury causation does not mean that defendants have met …
Learning The Wrong Lessons From "An American Tragedy": A Critique Of The Berger-Twerski Informed Choice Proposal, David E. Bernstein
Learning The Wrong Lessons From "An American Tragedy": A Critique Of The Berger-Twerski Informed Choice Proposal, David E. Bernstein
Michigan Law Review
Margaret Berger and Aaron Twerski are among the leading scholars in their respective fields of Evidence and Products Liability. I have benefited from their work on many occasions. Precisely because of the deserved respect and esteem in which Berger and Twerski are held-not to mention the prominence of their forum, the Michigan Law Review-their proposal to create a new "informed choice" cause of action in pharmaceutical litigation is likely to receive sympathetic attention. Because I believe that their proposal is ill-conceived and dangerous, I feel compelled (with some trepidation) to write this response. Berger and Twerski propose that courts recognize …
In Facetiis Verititas: How Improv Comedy Can Help Lawyers Get Some Chops, Steven Lubet
In Facetiis Verititas: How Improv Comedy Can Help Lawyers Get Some Chops, Steven Lubet
ExpressO
Lawyers can learn a lot from the theory of improvisational comedy, and it isn’t just a matter of thinking on your feet. As we will explain, the key concept in both disciplines is the creation of a new, temporary reality. In improvisation, the cast must draw the audience into sharing the constructed reality of the stage, such that they can actually “see” the objects and characters portrayed, without the use of props or costumes. In trial, the lawyer must draw the jury into sharing the re-constructed reality of past events, such that they “see” what happened, even though they were …
What We Talk About When We Talk About Workplace Privacy, Anita Bernstein
What We Talk About When We Talk About Workplace Privacy, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Due Process And Punitive Damages: The Error Of Federal Excessiveness Jurisprudence, A. Benjamin Spencer
Due Process And Punitive Damages: The Error Of Federal Excessiveness Jurisprudence, A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court, in a line of several cases over the past decade, has established a rigorous federal constitutional excessiveness review for punitive damages awards based on the Due Process Clause. As a matter of substantive due process, says the Court, punitive awards must be evaluated by three "guideposts" set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore: the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct, the ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, and a comparison of the amount of punitive damages to any "civil or criminal penalties that could be imposed for comparable misconduct." Following up on this pronouncement …
Primer Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Primer Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Memorias del Primer Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autonomos
European Implications Of Bankruptcy Venue Shopping In The U.S., David A. Skeel Jr.
European Implications Of Bankruptcy Venue Shopping In The U.S., David A. Skeel Jr.
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Venue Choice: Where The Action Is, William C. Whitford
Venue Choice: Where The Action Is, William C. Whitford
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Courting Failure, Lynn M. Lopucki
Class Actions, Thomas M. Byrne
Class Actions, Thomas M. Byrne
Mercer Law Review
After an eventful 2004, in which the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals explored in depth the class certification requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court's 2005 docket presented more threshold questions concerning whether or not putative class actions could proceed past the pleading stage. The court's most important class action decisions during the year addressed the efficacy of contract provisions designed to preclude class actions in favor of individual arbitration proceedings. This issue is among the most controversial in class action law, as many businesses have turned to using standard arbitration provisions to curtail …
Trial Practice And Procedure, John O'Shea Sullivan, Ashby L. Kent
Trial Practice And Procedure, John O'Shea Sullivan, Ashby L. Kent
Mercer Law Review
The 2005 survey period yielded several noteworthy decisions relating to federal trial practice and procedure, many of which concerned issues of first impression in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. This Article analyzes several recent developments in the Eleventh Circuit, including significant rulings in the areas of arbitration, civil procedure, statutory interpretation, personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and other issues of interest to the trial practitioner.
The Optimal Law Enforcement With Mandatory Defendant Class Actions, Nelson Rodrigues Netto
The Optimal Law Enforcement With Mandatory Defendant Class Actions, Nelson Rodrigues Netto
ExpressO
In this article we argue that the optimal law enforcement system is based on an ideal mechanism to prevent and redress harms in the mass information society. This goal is achieved by means of mandatory defendant class actions.
The idea of mass society has evolved in time since the beginning of the industrialization in the 18th century. At that time, the transformation of the means of production from artisanal craftwork to large scale machinery work, forged the concept of mass production. Nowadays, massive and expeditious relationships are created by sophisticated communications links, especially the Internet, furnishing services and goods, which …
The Optimal Law Enforcement With Mandatory Defendant Class Action, Nelson Rodrigues Netto
The Optimal Law Enforcement With Mandatory Defendant Class Action, Nelson Rodrigues Netto
ExpressO
In this article we argue that the optimal law enforcement system is based on an ideal mechanism to prevent and redress harms in the mass information society. This goal is achieved by means of mandatory defendant class actions.
The idea of mass society has evolved in time since the beginning of the industrialization in the 18th century. At that time, the transformation of the means of production from artisanal craftwork to large scale machinery work, forged the concept of mass production. Nowadays, massive and expeditious relationships are created by sophisticated communications links, especially the Internet, furnishing services and goods, which …
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.
Recombinant Proteins Containing Repeating Units, Qi Wang, Zhonghon Guan, Brendan O. Baggot, Kristen Hadfield, Jianmin Zhao, Janice Edwards
Recombinant Proteins Containing Repeating Units, Qi Wang, Zhonghon Guan, Brendan O. Baggot, Kristen Hadfield, Jianmin Zhao, Janice Edwards
Brendan O. Baggot
Methods for the production of recombinant proteins containing repeating units are disclosed. Also disclosed are methods for the production of degenerate polynucleotides encoding said recombinant proteins. In addition, polypeptides and polynucleotides produced by the methods of current invention are also disclosed.
Review Essay: Using All Available Information, Max Huffman
Review Essay: Using All Available Information, Max Huffman
ExpressO
This is a review essay entitled “Using All Available Information,” in which I review and comment on Justice Stephen Breyer’s new book, Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution, published in September 2005. Justice Breyer’s book, adapted from the Tanner Lectures given in 2005 at Harvard Law School, serves partly as a response to Justice Scalia’s 1997 volume A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. I review Justice Breyer’s book in part by comparison to and contrast with Justice Scalia’s. I propose that much about Justice Breyer’s interpretive philosophy, which centers on determining the “purposes” of texts and interpreting …
Final Offer Arbitration In The New Era Of Major League Baseball, Spencer B. Gordon
Final Offer Arbitration In The New Era Of Major League Baseball, Spencer B. Gordon
ExpressO
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the economic, athletic, and social impact of final offer salary arbitration in Major League Baseball (“MLB”). The article delves into the motivations, fluctuations, and evolution of the player-owner relationship and free agency. The commentary then focuses on the distinguishing features and intricacies of final offer arbitration. Although salary arbitration in the context of Major League Baseball is a topic oft discussed in the law review setting, the analysis rarely reaches the level exhibited in this article. Moreover, most articles on the subject were written between 1996 and 2000 when the 1994 players’ strike …
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
By now we all are familiar with the litany of cases which refused to find elevated scrutiny for so-called “affirmative” or “social” rights such as education, welfare or housing: Lindsey v. Normet, San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, Dandridge v. Williams, DeShaney v. Winnebago County. There didn’t seem to be anything in minimum scrutiny which could protect such facts as education or housing, from government action. However, unobtrusively and over the years, the Supreme Court has clarified and articulated one aspect of minimum scrutiny which holds promise for vindicating facts. You will recall that under minimum scrutiny government’s action is …
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Capture theory--in which private purpose is substituted for government purpose--sheds light on a technique which is coming into greater use post-Kelo v. New London. That case affirmed that eminent domain use need only be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. Capture theory focuses litigators' attention on "government purpose." That is a question of fact for the trier of fact. This article shows how to use civil discovery in order to show the Court that private purpose has been substituted for government purpose. If it has, the eminent domain use fails, because the use does not meet minimum scrutiny. This …
Active Water Resource Management: Tools For Better Water Management, John D'Antonio
Active Water Resource Management: Tools For Better Water Management, John D'Antonio
Publications
No abstract provided.
Water For Energy In The Southwest: Where Will It Come From?, Marilyn C. O'Leary
Water For Energy In The Southwest: Where Will It Come From?, Marilyn C. O'Leary
Publications
No abstract provided.
Water For Energy In The Southwest: Finding Water For Mohave, Stanley M. Pollack
Water For Energy In The Southwest: Finding Water For Mohave, Stanley M. Pollack
Publications
No abstract provided.
Why Does The Chesapeake Bay Need Litigators?, Jon A. Mueller, Joseph Tannery
Why Does The Chesapeake Bay Need Litigators?, Jon A. Mueller, Joseph Tannery
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amending Perpetual Conservation Easements: A Case Study Of The Myrtle Grove Controversy, Nancy A. Mclaughlin
Amending Perpetual Conservation Easements: A Case Study Of The Myrtle Grove Controversy, Nancy A. Mclaughlin
University of Richmond Law Review
This article explores the issue of amending perpetual conservation easements by examining the Myrtle Grove controversy, in which the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States (the "National Trust")" "conceptually approved" a request made by a successor owner of land encumbered by a perpetual conservation easement to substantially amend the easement. Several months later, as a result of public opposition to the amendments and a reassessment of its position, the National Trust withdrew that approval. The owner of the encumbered land subsequently filed a suit for breach of contract, and the National Trust and the Attorney General of …
Medical Malpractice Litigation And Tort Reform: It's The Incentives, Stupid, David A. Hyman, Charles Silver
Medical Malpractice Litigation And Tort Reform: It's The Incentives, Stupid, David A. Hyman, Charles Silver
Vanderbilt Law Review
Health care providers and tort reformers invariably claim that the medical malpractice litigation system is rife with behaviors that are irrational, unpredictable, and counter-productive. They attack civil juries, asserting that verdicts are skyrocketing without reason, are highly variable, and bear little or no relation to the merits of plaintiffs' claims. They complain about patients, arguing that the few with valid claims sue rarely, while the many who receive non- negligent treatment sue all the time. They attack greedy lawyers, alleging that they rake in obscene profits by routinely filing frivolous complaints. They complain that compensation flows almost randomly, winding up …
Provincializing Transitional Justice: Reading The International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda Against The Grain, Jatin Dua
Archived Theses and Dissertations
No abstract provided.
The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges, Marvin L. Longabaugh
The Z-Test For Percentages: A Statistical Tool To Detect Pretextually Neutral Juror Challenges, Marvin L. Longabaugh
ExpressO
In the article, I discuss the potential use of public opinion polls to measure the discriminatory effect of certain questions in jury selection. While the laws surrounding race and gender based jury selection are known to most lawyers, there has been little scrutiny on questions that might be posed to potential jurors that are facially neutral, yet have a discriminatory impact. This article examines a number of such questions and offers a statistical test to determine whether a proposed question has, in fact, a 98% certainty of having a discriminatory effect if relied upon in jury selection.
The Application Of Federal Common Law To Overcome Conflicting State Laws In The Supplemental Disgorgement Proceedings Of An Sec Appointed Receiver, Gauhar Naseem
ExpressO
In spite of the Erie doctrine, the application of federal common law has survived to overcome conflicting state laws in diversity actions where a federal law, interest or function is implicated. A federal court’s authority to substantively implement a federal common law rule over state law is clearest when the party to the action is a federal entity, namely an agency of the U.S. Government deriving its authority from the Constitution or some source of federal law. Analyzing such authority becomes more difficult in circumstances where parties to a diversity lawsuit are private citizens (not necessarily possessing any direct federal …
Judicial Discretion To Condition, Thomas O. Main
Judicial Discretion To Condition, Thomas O. Main
ExpressO
The task of judging has been described as the art or science of making discrete choices among competing courses of action. Charged with the mandate to administer justice fairly and equitably, judges are said to have discretion to pursue any lawful course. In both criminal and civil cases, and regarding matters profound and trivial, the exercise of discretion is a core judicial function. The exercise of discretion is often characterized by vivid metaphors: judges confront a frame of possibilities, a zone, a range, a doughnut hole, two paths or a fork in the road, a fenced pasture.
Above all else, …