Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (74)
- Law and Society (19)
- First Amendment (16)
- Courts (15)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
-
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Legal History (10)
- Religion Law (10)
- Judges (8)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (6)
- Education Law (6)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Juvenile Law (5)
- Labor and Employment Law (5)
- Legal Remedies (5)
- President/Executive Department (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Torts (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Conflict of Laws (3)
- Election Law (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 92 of 92
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Introduction: Blessed Are The Compromisers?, Robert F. Cochran Jr.
Introduction: Blessed Are The Compromisers?, Robert F. Cochran Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshall V Madison: The Supreme Court And Original Intent, 1803-1835, Gordon Lloyd
Marshall V Madison: The Supreme Court And Original Intent, 1803-1835, Gordon Lloyd
School of Public Policy Working Papers
Should the justices of the Supreme Court rely on “original intent” as the foundation for constitutional interpretation? Or should they be free to interpret the Constitution in light of hermeneutical approaches created by current philosophies of law? This essay examines the Marshall Court to determine whether its opinions take their bearings from the American Founding or instead rely on a philosophy of jurisprudence that can be separated from the Founding. The purposes of this essay are fourfold: 1) to provide a comprehensive account of the use of the Framers by the Marshall Court, 2) address the normative question of the …