Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (55)
- Torts (14)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (7)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
-
- Education Law (4)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Insurance Law (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Marketing Law (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (6)
- Legal ethics (6)
- Tort law (6)
- Health law (3)
- Legal malpractice (3)
-
- Arbitration (2)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Education law (2)
- Employment law (2)
- Legal profession (2)
- Medical malpractice (2)
- Non-profit organizations (2)
- Property law (2)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2)
- "the short tender rule" (1)
- Abrogated (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Adoption laws (1)
- Advertising (1)
- Antitrust laws (1)
- Banishment (1)
- Compensatory damages (1)
- Contingent fee (1)
- Continuance policy (1)
- Contributory negligence (1)
- Court decision (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Damages (1)
- Drug dependency (1)
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Contingent Fee: Champerty Or Champion, Arthur L. Kraut
Contingent Fee: Champerty Or Champion, Arthur L. Kraut
Cleveland State Law Review
In 1952, an article appeared in Reader's Digest magazine castigating both the contingent fee system of financing litigation and the trial lawyers of the United States. Since that article appeared, the client public has been barraged with a stream of propaganda aimed at barring the use of the contingent fee as a means of retaining a lawyer.