Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (9)
- SelectedWorks (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- New York Law School (2)
-
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Mississippi College School of Law (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Publications (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Martin A. Schwartz (3)
- Thomas A. Schweitzer (3)
- Articles (2)
-
- Jonathan Peters (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Daniel Hare (1)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Gregory Brazeal (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Kent Greenfield (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (1)
- Samuel J. Levine (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 40 of 40
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
(Re)Complexioning A Simple Tale: Race, Speech, And Colored Leadership, Angela Mae Kupenda
(Re)Complexioning A Simple Tale: Race, Speech, And Colored Leadership, Angela Mae Kupenda
Journal Articles
Rather than acting as a whitening agent, the law should reflect the natural (re)complexioning of society and adapt to the melting pot that is America. The term "(re)complexioning" is used because the idea that the complexion of America was white at the beginning is false. Prior to the "discovery" of America, native citizens were indeed more deeply complexioned than Whites. Any (re)complexioning of the law since, to reflect the colors of America, then, is just to resort to the recognition of factual premises unjustly rejected when America was usurped from those of color and denied to others of color after …
Teaching Values, Teaching Stereotypes: Sex Education And Indoctrination In Public Schools, Jennifer S. Hendricks, Dawn Marie Howerton
Teaching Values, Teaching Stereotypes: Sex Education And Indoctrination In Public Schools, Jennifer S. Hendricks, Dawn Marie Howerton
Publications
Many sex education curricula currently used in public schools indoctrinate students in gender stereotypes. As expressed in the title of one article: "If You Don't Aim to Please, Don't Dress to Tease," and Other Public School Sex Education Lessons Subsidized by You, the Federal Taxpayer, Jennifer L. Greenblatt, 14 Tex.J. on CL. & CR. 1 (2008). Other lessons pertain not only to responsibility for sexual activity but to lifelong approaches to family life and individual achievement. One lesson, for example, instructs students that, in marriage, men need sex from their wives and women need financial support from their husbands. …
Campaign Speech Law With A Twist: When The Government Is The Speaker, Not The Regulator, Helen Norton
Campaign Speech Law With A Twist: When The Government Is The Speaker, Not The Regulator, Helen Norton
Publications
Although government entities frequently engage in issue-related campaign speech on a variety of contested ballot and legislative measures, this fact has been entirely overlooked in contemporary First Amendment debates over campaign speech law specifically and government speech more generally. The Supreme Court's "campaign speech" and "government speech" dockets have focused to date on claims by private parties that the government has restricted or silenced their speech in violation of the First Amendment. In contrast, disputes over what this Article calls "governmental campaign speech" involve Free Speech Clause and other challenges by private parties who seek instead to silence the government's …
Affirmative Action As Government Speech, William M. Carter Jr.
Affirmative Action As Government Speech, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
This article seeks to transform how we think about “affirmative action.” The Supreme Court’s affirmative action jurisprudence appears to be a seamless whole, but closer examination reveals important differences. Government race-consciousness sometimes grants a benefit to members of a minority group for remedial or diversifying purposes. But the government may also undertake remedial or diversifying race-conscious action without it resulting in unequal treatment or disadvantage to non-minorities. Under the Court’s current equal protection doctrine, both categories of cases are treated as presumptively unconstitutional. Race-consciousness itself has become a constitutional harm, regardless of tangible effects.
Prior scholarship has suggested that the …
Law School Clinics And The First Amendment, Jonathan L. Entin
Law School Clinics And The First Amendment, Jonathan L. Entin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Comparing And Contrasting The Constitutional Approaches Of Justice Scalia And Justice Breyer Through The Pending Supreme Court Case Schwarzenegger V Entertainment Merchants Association, Katherine E. Moran Ms.
Comparing And Contrasting The Constitutional Approaches Of Justice Scalia And Justice Breyer Through The Pending Supreme Court Case Schwarzenegger V Entertainment Merchants Association, Katherine E. Moran Ms.
CMC Senior Theses
The aim of this thesis is to explore the differences and similarities between Justice Antonin Scalia’s textualist approach to interpreting the Constitution and Justice Stephen Breyer’s Living Constitution approach (also called the evolutionist approach) by applying these disparate legal theories to Schwarzenegger v Entertainment Merchants Association, a case currently pending before the Supreme Court whose resolution centers on the interpretation of the First Amendment. The textualist approach relies primarily on interpreting the original meaning of the text of the Constitution, and attempting to decide cases in a way that is faithful to an amendment’s words as written (Rossum et …
Religious Freedom, Church-State Separation, & The Ministerial Exception, Carl H. Esbeck, Thomas C. Berg, Kimberlee Wood Colby, Richard W. Garnett
Religious Freedom, Church-State Separation, & The Ministerial Exception, Carl H. Esbeck, Thomas C. Berg, Kimberlee Wood Colby, Richard W. Garnett
Faculty Publications
The Hosanna-Tabor case concerns the separation of church and state, an arrangement that is often misunderstood but is nevertheless a critical dimension of the freedom of religion protected by the First Amendment to our Constitution. For nearly a thousand years, the tradition of Western constitutionalism - the project of protecting political freedom by marking boundaries to the power of government - has been assisted by the principled commitment to religious liberty and to church-state separation, correctly understood. A community that respects - as ours does - both the importance of, and the distinction between, the spheres of political and religious …
Snyder V. Phelps: A Hard Case That Did Not Make Bad Law, Paul E. Salamanca
Snyder V. Phelps: A Hard Case That Did Not Make Bad Law, Paul E. Salamanca
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In Snyder v. Phelps, the Court stood by the First Amendment in hard times. A religious group conducted a protest some 1,000 feet from a fallen marine's funeral, holding such pickets as “God Hates the USA,” “Thank God for Dead Soldiers,” and “You're Going to Hell.” Despite the empathy that virtually anyone would feel for the marine's grieving father, the Court held by a vote of eight to one that his action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and intrusion upon seclusion could not survive, owing largely to the public nature of the issues the protesters had raised. “Hard …
Epic Considerations: The Speech That The Supreme Court Would Not Hear In Snyder V. Phelps, Jeffrey Shulman
Epic Considerations: The Speech That The Supreme Court Would Not Hear In Snyder V. Phelps, Jeffrey Shulman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In declining to consider the “epic” posted by the Westboro Baptist Church on its web site, the Supreme Court took most (but not quite all) of the good constitutional stuff out of Snyder v. Phelps. The Court may have sought to make this an easy case by considering only the contents of the church’s picketing placards. For the Court, the placards highlighted such issues of public import as “the political and moral conduct of the United States and its citizens, the fate of our nation, homosexuality in the military, and scandals involving the Catholic clergy.” On grounds that we …
First Amendment Investigations And The Inescapable Pragmatism Of The Common Law Of Free Speech, Lawrence Rosenthal
First Amendment Investigations And The Inescapable Pragmatism Of The Common Law Of Free Speech, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
Scholars have struggled to explain our sprawling First Amendment doctrine – once described by Justice Stevens as “an elaborate mosaic of specific judicial decisions, characteristic of the common law process of case-by-case adjudication.” The position that has gained the most traction in recent scholarship has stressed the primacy of governmental motive – this school of thought argues that the degree of scrutiny to be afforded a challenged regulation is based on an assessment of the likelihood that the regulation reflects a governmental motive to burden disfavored speech or speakers.
This article offers a challenge to the purposivist account. It begins, …