Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States (2)
- African American (1)
- COLA (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Constitutional law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of Speech (1)
- Government and politics (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- History (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Justice Studies (1)
- Legal (1)
- President (1)
- Protected Expression (1)
- Pure Speech (1)
- Segregation (1)
- Signing statements (1)
- Social media (1)
- Student speech (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Veto messages (1)
- Wedding Cakes (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Tinkering With Tinker: Why The Supreme Court Must Protect Student Speech Through Social Media, Alexis Roach
Tinkering With Tinker: Why The Supreme Court Must Protect Student Speech Through Social Media, Alexis Roach
Honors Theses and Capstones
The goal of this paper is to address the failing of the Supreme Court in their decision of the case Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.[1]. While the Court defended students’ rights to free speech under the First Amendment in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)[2], they have since restricted that right through a number of cases. While the Court’s decision in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. protected student speech, the Court failed to provide a standard for application in cases regarding social media in schools. This paper argues that while the Court was correct in …
Presidents And The U.S. Constitution: The Executive’S Role In Interpreting The Supreme Law Of The Land, Mitchell Scacchi
Presidents And The U.S. Constitution: The Executive’S Role In Interpreting The Supreme Law Of The Land, Mitchell Scacchi
Honors Theses and Capstones
In 1832, President Andrew Jackson issued a veto message claiming the same duty as the Supreme Court to interpret the U.S. Constitution. Do modern presidents exercise the principal role in interpreting the U.S. Constitution that President Jackson claimed was their duty, and, if so, in what ways do they choose to articulate their interpretations? The hypothesis is that modern presidents have exercised a principal role in interpreting the U.S. Constitution similar to the interpretative duty expressed by President Jackson, and they perform this duty, in part, through the issuance of veto messages and signing statements. After a content analysis of …
Masterpieces Or Simply Wedding Cakes? Exploring The Boundaries Of Freedom Of Speech Through United States Supreme Court Case Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Margaret Mclean Quick
Masterpieces Or Simply Wedding Cakes? Exploring The Boundaries Of Freedom Of Speech Through United States Supreme Court Case Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Margaret Mclean Quick
Honors Theses and Capstones
No abstract provided.
Segregation In United States Healthcare: From Reconstruction To Deluxe Jim Crow, Kerri L. Hunkele
Segregation In United States Healthcare: From Reconstruction To Deluxe Jim Crow, Kerri L. Hunkele
Honors Theses and Capstones
During the time period between Reconstruction and the Deluxe Jim Crow era, African Americans were legally oppressed, which hindered their ability to live fully and equally in society with whites. This was especially true in terms of healthcare. Segregation laws were implemented to separate blacks from the rest of society in everyday life; the worst of these laws affected the ability of African Americans to gain access to medical care that was equal to whites. This inequality prevented blacks from being accepted into society and from living quality lives that stem from adequate healthcare. Although the federal and state governments …