Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (7)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Pepperdine University (2)
-
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Patricia E. Salkin (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (3)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Lynne H. Rambo (1)
- Melissa R Hart (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Reviews (1)
- Sarah Mourer (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- St. John's Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Municipal Ethics Remain A Hot Topic In Litigation: A 1999 Survey Of Issues In Ethics For Municipal Lawyers, Patricia E. Salkin
Municipal Ethics Remain A Hot Topic In Litigation: A 1999 Survey Of Issues In Ethics For Municipal Lawyers, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
1998 Survey Of Ethics In Land-Use Planning, Patricia E. Salkin
1998 Survey Of Ethics In Land-Use Planning, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Bias In The Washington Courts: A Call For Reform, Melisa D. Evangelos
Bias In The Washington Courts: A Call For Reform, Melisa D. Evangelos
Seattle University Law Review
Because of the documented threat that racial and gender bias pose to the effective administration of justice in Washington, this Comment advocates amending the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct to explicitly make intentional gender and racial bias an act of attorney misconduct and to discipline any attorney who engages in such behavior. Section I of this Comment identifies and describes instances of attorney behavior that result in gender and racial bias and explains the impact of such bias on attorneys, clients, and the judicial system. Section II explores similar anti-bias rules proposed or in place in other states. Section III …
Criminal Law-Misconduct Of Attorneys During Trial-Possible Remedies
Criminal Law-Misconduct Of Attorneys During Trial-Possible Remedies
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner was indicted in a federal district court charged with having conspired with others to utter counterfeit Federal Reserve Bank notes. The case against the accused was weak. The prosecuting attorney in his arguments to the jury and in the examination of witnesses persisted over defendant's objections in making improper suggestions, insinuations and unproved assertions of personal knowledge, all highly unfavorable to defendant's case. The district court sustained objections to some of the questions but the case was submitted to the jury and defendant found guilty. Defendant appealed. Held, the misconduct of the prosecuting attorney being prejudicial to defendant …
Disqualification Of Judges By Prejudice, Edson R. Sunderland
Disqualification Of Judges By Prejudice, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
Under the provisions of Section 21 of the Federal Judicial Code, Victor Berger and others, who had been indicted under the Espionage Act in the Northern District of Illinois, filed an affidavit charging Judge Landis with personal bias and prejudice against them as German-Americans, and moved for the assignment of another judge to preside at their trial. The motion was overruled by Judge Landis, and he himself presided at the trial, and the defendants were convicted and sentenced. The Supreme Court of the United States, to which the matter came on certificate, held, three justices dissenting, that Judge Landis could …