Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Robert B Leflar (6)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (5)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (2)
-
- 2013 New England Association for Asian Studies Conference (1)
- Craig Martin (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Mary Alice Haddad (1)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Pomona Senior Theses (1)
- Publications (1)
- Robert M. Bloom (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- Shifting Baselines and New Meridians: Water, Resources, Landscapes, and the Transformation of the American West (Summer Conference, June 4-6) (1)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (1)
- University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 37 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Law And Culture Of The Apology In Korean Dispute Settlement (With Japan And The United States In Mind), Ilhyung Lee
The Law And Culture Of The Apology In Korean Dispute Settlement (With Japan And The United States In Mind), Ilhyung Lee
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article addresses the apology in civil dispute settlement in Korea, Japan's neighbor across the East Sea, using the U.S.-Japan comparative discussion as a helpful frame of reference. Part I provides the necessary background on the meaning of the apology and the leading commentary along the U.S.-Japan axis, beginning with the work of Wagatsuma and Rosett. Culture appears in this discussion in two regards. First, a question arises as to whether the very meaning of the apology as noted in the commentary reflects the U.S. cultural orientation, or instead has universal application. Second, some argue that cultural norms explain the …
Medical Error As Reportable Event, As Tort, As Crime: A Transpacific Comparison, Robert B. Leflar, Futoshi Iwata
Medical Error As Reportable Event, As Tort, As Crime: A Transpacific Comparison, Robert B. Leflar, Futoshi Iwata
Robert B Leflar
All nations seek to reduce the human toll from medical error, but variations in legal and institutional structures guide those efforts into different trajectories. This article compares legal and institutional responses to patient safety problems in the United States and Japan, addressing developments in civil malpractice law (including discoverability of internal hospital documents), administrative practice (including medical accident reporting systems), and - of particular significance in Japan - criminal law. In the U.S., battles over rules of malpractice litigation are fierce; tort law occupies center stage. The hospital accreditation process plays a critical role in medical quality control, and peer …
Informed Consent And Patients' Rights In Japan: 2001 Epilogue, Robert B. Leflar
Informed Consent And Patients' Rights In Japan: 2001 Epilogue, Robert B. Leflar
Robert B Leflar
Japan is on a steeper trajectory toward the incorporation of informed consent principles into medical practice than the “gradual transformation” observed in a 1996 article, Informed Consent and Patients’ Rights in Japan. Among the most significant recent developments from 1996 to 2001 have been these seven: (1) the 1997 enactment of the Organ Transplantation Law permitting the use of brain death criteria in limited circumstances in which informed consent is present; (2) the strengthening of patients’ rights in clinical drug trials; (3) the continued trend toward increasing disclosure to patients of cancer diagnoses; (4) initiatives by the health ministry toward …
Informed Consent And Patients' Rights In Japan, Robert B. Leflar
Informed Consent And Patients' Rights In Japan, Robert B. Leflar
Robert B Leflar
This article analyzes the development of the concept of informed consent in the context of the culture and economics of Japanese medicine, and locates that development within the framework of the nation's civil law system. Part II sketches the cultural foundations of medical paternalism in Japan; explores the economic incentives (many of them administratively directed) that have sustained physicians' traditional dominant roles; and describes the judiciary's hesitancy to challenge physicians' professional discretion. Part III delineates the forces testing the paternalist model: the undermining of the physicians' personal knowledge of their patients that accompanies the shift from neighborhood clinic to high-tech …
Administering Justice In A Consensus-Based Society, Koichiro Fujikura
Administering Justice In A Consensus-Based Society, Koichiro Fujikura
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Authority Without Power: Law and the Japanese Paradox by John O. Haley
Making America Competitive, Mark J. Loewenstein
Sociological Justice, Christopher M. Adams
Sociological Justice, Christopher M. Adams
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Sociological Justice by Donald Black