Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
-
- Christopher J DeClue (3)
- Deana A Pollard (3)
- Elizabeth R Ribet (3)
- Linda H. Edwards (3)
- Adam Lamparello (2)
-
- Benjamin E. Brockman-Hawe (2)
- Bryan W Wolford (2)
- David B Kopel (2)
- David Pimentel (2)
- Elizabeth Pugliese (2)
- Hezi Margalit (2)
- JoAnne Sweeny (2)
- Joseph Zernik (2)
- Matthew J. Jowanna (2)
- Subramanya Sirish Tamvada (2)
- helen m alvare (2)
- michal buchhandler-raphael (2)
- Aaron Martin (1)
- Adam M Hochroth (1)
- Ali Allawi (1)
- Amos Prosser Davis (1)
- Ana M Nacvalovaite (1)
- Andrea Pestone Capellán (1)
- Andres J Ortiz (1)
- Angela Huddleston (1)
- Annie Macaleer (1)
- Ansel J. Halliburton (1)
- Aquila M Alvarenga Mr. (1)
- Ari E Waldman (1)
- Austin R Caster (1)
- File Type
Articles 121 - 121 of 121
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Qualitative And Quantitative Proportionality - A Specific Critique Of Retributivism, John D. Castiglione
Qualitative And Quantitative Proportionality - A Specific Critique Of Retributivism, John D. Castiglione
John D. Castiglione
This Article presents a normative model of proportionality review under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. I divide proportionality into two organizing concepts: “qualitative proportionality,” which concerns the methods used to punish the individual and the conditions under which he serves his sentence, and “quantitative proportionality,” which concerns the temporal length of the sentence imposed. I argue that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause is best understood to mandate review of the qualitative proportionality of the sentence, but not the quantitative proportionality of the punishment. The most significant feature of this model is an appreciation for the role of human …