Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- International law (5)
- Human rights (4)
- AJIL (2)
- American Journal of International Law (2)
- International Court of Justice (2)
-
- International Court of Justice (ICJ) (2)
- Palestine (2)
- VAT (2)
- 21st century (1)
- ASIL (1)
- Academic trends (1)
- Alien Tort Statute (1)
- American Society of International Law (ASIL) (1)
- American Society of International Law Proceedings (1)
- American Society of lnternational Law (ASIL) (1)
- Arbitral tribunal (1)
- Biological weapon states (1)
- Biometric identifiers (1)
- Book reviews (1)
- British law (1)
- Carousel Fraud (1)
- Centennial essays (1)
- Certified software (1)
- Certified tax software (1)
- Columbia Journal of Gender and Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Combined operations (Military science) (1)
- Comparative criminal law (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Constitutional analysis (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Lawyering Across Multiple Legal Orders – Rethinking Legal Education In Comparative And International Law, Katharina Pistor
Lawyering Across Multiple Legal Orders – Rethinking Legal Education In Comparative And International Law, Katharina Pistor
Faculty Scholarship
I appreciate the opportunity to briefly introduce a new course Columbia Law School is offering to first year students for the first time this spring semester. The course, which I will be co-teaching with my colleague George Bermann, is called "Lawyering in Multiple Legal Orders." The title reflects the basic "philosophy" of the course, namely that legal practitioners today will invariably work in more than one legal order. This notion is not unfamiliar to lawyers practicing in federal systems, such as the United States. By the end of the first semester students have a basic understanding of the federalist system …
Our International Constitution, Sarah H. Cleveland
Our International Constitution, Sarah H. Cleveland
Faculty Scholarship
This Article seeks to challenge and redirect contemporary debate regarding the role of international law in constitutional interpretation based upon an examination of historical Supreme Court practice. The Article has three goals: It first marshals the weight of evidence regarding the Supreme Court's historical use of international law in constitutional analysis, to rebut the claim that the practice is new. It then analyzes the ways that the Court has used international law from a legitimacy perspective, and finally draws lessons from the historical practice to offer preliminary suggestions- regarding the normatively appropriate use of international law.