Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (400)
- SelectedWorks (230)
- Pepperdine University (157)
- Duquesne University (94)
- Duke Law (53)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (45)
- Georgetown University Law Center (39)
- William & Mary Law School (36)
- University of Michigan Law School (34)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (31)
- Seattle University School of Law (30)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (28)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (26)
- UC Law SF (24)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (22)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (18)
- University of the Pacific (17)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (15)
- Boston University School of Law (13)
- University of Georgia School of Law (13)
- University of Richmond (13)
- Columbia Law School (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (12)
- Cleveland State University (10)
- Florida State University College of Law (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (10)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (10)
- UIC School of Law (9)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (325)
- Constitutional law (142)
- First Amendment (107)
- Philosophy (95)
- Theology (94)
-
- American Religious Democracy (91)
- Hallowed Secularism (91)
- Constitution (81)
- Supreme Court (80)
- Politics (74)
- Law and Society (64)
- Constitutional History (63)
- Law (53)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (52)
- Fourteenth Amendment (52)
- Jurisprudence (49)
- Religion (48)
- Right to counsel (44)
- United States Supreme Court (44)
- Courts (42)
- Due process (40)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (39)
- Equal protection (38)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (36)
- Federalism (36)
- Legal History (33)
- Fourth Amendment (32)
- Legislation (32)
- Civil Rights (29)
- Human rights (29)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (114)
- Hallowed Secularism (91)
- Faculty Scholarship (85)
- Peter J. Aschenbrenner (61)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (42)
-
- Touro Law Review (42)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (35)
- All Faculty Scholarship (27)
- Articles (24)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (24)
- Faculty Publications (22)
- Richard W Garnett (17)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (17)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (16)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (15)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (15)
- Michigan Law Review (15)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (14)
- Florida Law Review (13)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (13)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy (12)
- Law Faculty Publications (12)
- McGeorge Law Review (12)
- Seattle University Law Review (12)
- Maryland Law Review (11)
- Alan E Garfield (10)
- Corey A Ciocchetti (10)
- Journal Articles (10)
- Kent Greenfield (10)
- NULR Online (10)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 1657
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Ownership Without Citizenship: The Creation Of Noncitizen Property Rights, Allison Brownell Tirres
Ownership Without Citizenship: The Creation Of Noncitizen Property Rights, Allison Brownell Tirres
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
At the nation’s founding, the common law of property defined ownership as an incident of citizenship. Noncitizens were unable lawfully to hold, devise, or inherit property. This doctrine eroded during the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but few scholars have examined its demise or the concommittant rise of property rights for foreigners. This Article is the first sustained treatment of the creation of property rights for noncitizens in American law. It uncovers two key sources for the rights that emerged during the nineteenth century: federal territorial law, which allowed for alien property ownership and alien suffrage, and state …
Government Nonendorsement, Nelson Tebbe
Government Nonendorsement, Nelson Tebbe
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
What are the constitutional limits on government endorsement? Judges and scholars typically assume that when the government speaks on its own account, it faces few restrictions. In fact, they often say that the only real restriction on government speech is the Establishment Clause. On this view, officials cannot endorse, say, Christianity, but otherwise they enjoy wide latitude to promote democracy or denigrate smoking. Two doctrines and their accompanying literatures have fed this impression. First, the Court’s recent free speech cases have suggested that government speech is virtually unfettered. Second, experts on religious freedom have long assumed that there is no …
The Great American Gun Violence Lottery, Erin Ryan
The Great American Gun Violence Lottery, Erin Ryan
Erin Ryan
Reflecting on the one-year anniversary of the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, this very short essay compares the experience of gun violence in America to the dystopian game of chance in Shirley Jackson’s classic American short story, “The Lottery.” With references to the role of Constitutional law, media consumption, and cultural change, it urges an available, common-sense middle ground on gun policy. The essay was first published by the American Constitution Society (Dec. 17, 2013) and later appeared in the Huffington Post (Dec. 20, 2013).
The Illusory Eighth Amendment, John F. Stinneford
The Illusory Eighth Amendment, John F. Stinneford
UF Law Faculty Publications
Although there is no obvious doctrinal connection between the Supreme Court’s Miranda jurisprudence and its Eighth Amendment excessive punishments jurisprudence, the two are deeply connected at the level of methodology. In both areas, the Supreme Court has been criticized for creating “prophylactic” rules that invalidate government actions because they create a mere risk of constitutional violation. In reality, however, both sets of rules deny constitutional protection to a far greater number of individuals with plausible claims of unconstitutional treatment than they protect.
This dysfunctional combination of over- and underprotection arises from the Supreme Court’s use of implementation rules as a …
Reproductive Injustice In The New Millennium, Sybil Shainwald
Reproductive Injustice In The New Millennium, Sybil Shainwald
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
A reexamination of the history of abortion law in the United States is essential to an understanding of recent changes. Part I of this Article will provide a synopsis of the early Anglo-American view of abortion at common law, the early anti-abortion statutes, and the state of abortion during the early twentieth century. Part II will discuss the liberalization of abortion laws, as well as the ways in which the law pertaining to a woman’s right to choose has evolved since 1973. Finally, Part III will analyze the constitutionality of the current wave of restrictions.
The Right To “Do Politics” And Not Just To Speak: Thinking About The Constitutional Protections For Political Action, Robert F. Bauer
The Right To “Do Politics” And Not Just To Speak: Thinking About The Constitutional Protections For Political Action, Robert F. Bauer
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Interning Dissent: The Law Of Large Political Events, Aaron Johnson
Interning Dissent: The Law Of Large Political Events, Aaron Johnson
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Aiding The Enemy Or Promoting Democracy? Defining The Rights Of Journalists And Whistleblowers To Disclose National Security Information, Candice M. Kines
Aiding The Enemy Or Promoting Democracy? Defining The Rights Of Journalists And Whistleblowers To Disclose National Security Information, Candice M. Kines
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Limits Of Custom In Constitutional And International Law, Michael D. Ramsey
The Limits Of Custom In Constitutional And International Law, Michael D. Ramsey
San Diego Law Review
This Article does not contend that arguments for extension of custom are illegitimate. Instead, it makes two more limited claims. First, there is an important difference between arguments from pure custom and arguments for the extension of custom, with the latter being more properly called common law arguments. Second, the legitimacy of common law arguments in some fields, especially constitutional law and international law, is substantially more problematic than the legitimacy of arguments from pure custom. The Article develops as follows. Part II sets out in greater detail the proposed distinction between arguments from pure custom and arguments for extension …
The Singapore Constitution: A Brief Introduction, Smu Apolitical
The Singapore Constitution: A Brief Introduction, Smu Apolitical
Student Publications
This primer seeks to provide an easy guide to those interested in finding out more about the Singapore Constitution. The Constitution provides for the structure of the government and the roles of the judiciary and the parliament. It also secures our fundamental liberties. Hence, some basic knowledge of the Constitution is useful for every citizen.
The primer starts by providing an introduction to the Singapore Constitution and explains the meaning of the concept of separation of powers among the executive, legislature and the judiciary. It also touches on the functions of the three entities, such as how laws are made …
The Resilience Of Property, Lynda L. Butler
The Resilience Of Property, Lynda L. Butler
Faculty Publications
Resilience is essential to the ability of property to face transforming social and environmental change. For centuries, property has responded to such change through a dialectical process that identifies emerging disciplinary perspectives and debates conflicting values and norms. This dialectic promotes the resilience of property, allowing it to adapt to changing conditions and needs. Today the mainstream economic theory dominating common law property is progressively being intertwined with constitutionally protected property, undermining its long-term resilience. The coupling of the economic vision of ordinary property with constitutional property embeds the assumptions, choices, and values of the economic theory into both realms …
Fraud On The Market After Amgen, James D. Cox
Fraud On The Market After Amgen, James D. Cox
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Fisher V. University Of Texas: Who Put The Holes In “Holistic”?, Rodney A. Smolla
Fisher V. University Of Texas: Who Put The Holes In “Holistic”?, Rodney A. Smolla
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Five Justices, Section 4, And Three Ways Forward In Voting Rights, Kareem Crayton, Jane Junn
Five Justices, Section 4, And Three Ways Forward In Voting Rights, Kareem Crayton, Jane Junn
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Calming Unsettled Waters: A Proposal For Navigating The Tenuous Power Divide Between The Federal Courts And The Uspto Under The American Invents Act, William Rose
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas
Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
Since the turn of the century, the Supreme Court has begun to regulate non-capital sentencing under the Sixth Amendment in the Apprendi line of cases (requiring jury findings of fact to justify sentence enhancements) as well as under the Eighth Amendment in the Miller and Graham line of cases (forbidding mandatory life imprisonment for juvenile defendants). Though both lines of authority sound in individual rights, in fact they are fundamentally about the structures of criminal justice. These two seemingly disparate lines of doctrine respond to structural imbalances in non-capital sentencing by promoting morally appropriate punishment judgments that are based on …
The Legality Of Deliberate Miranda Violations: How Two-Step National Security Interrogations Undermine Miranda And Destabilize Fifth Amendment Protections, Lee Ross Crain
Michigan Law Review
As part of the global “War on Terror,” federal agents intentionally delay issuing Miranda warnings to terrorism suspects during custodial interrogations. They delay the warnings presuming that unwarned suspects will more freely offer vital national security intelligence. After a suspect offers the information he has, agents administer Miranda warnings and attempt to elicit confessions that prosecutors can use at the suspect’s trial. No court has ruled on the constitutionality of this two-step national security interrogation process to determine whether admitting the second, warned confession is allowed under Miranda v. Arizona and its progeny. A fragmented Supreme Court examined two-step interrogations …
Legislative Diplomacy, Ryan M. Scoville
Legislative Diplomacy, Ryan M. Scoville
Michigan Law Review
A traditional view in legal scholarship holds that the U.S. Constitution assigns the president exclusive power to carry on official diplomatic communications with foreign governments. But in fact, Congress and its members routinely engage in communications of their own. Congress, for example, receives heads of state and maintains official contacts with foreign parliaments. And individual members of the House and Senate frequently travel overseas on congressional delegations (“CODELs”) to confer with foreign leaders, investigate problems that arise, promote the interests of the United States and constituents, and even represent the president. Moreover, many of these activities have occurred ever since …
Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas
Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas
Michigan Law Review
Since the turn of the century, the Supreme Court has regulated noncapital sentencing under the Sixth Amendment in the Apprendi line of cases (requiring jury findings of fact to justify sentence enhancements) as well as under the Eighth Amendment in the Miller and Graham line of cases (forbidding mandatory life imprisonment for juvenile defendants). Although both lines of authority sound in individual rights, in fact they are fundamentally about the structures of criminal justice. These two seemingly disparate doctrines respond to structural imbalances in noncapital sentencing by promoting morally appropriate punishment judgments that are based on individualized input and that …
Can We Calculate Fairness And Reasonableness? Determining What Satisfies The Fair Cross-Section Requirement Of The Sixth Amendment, Colleen P. Fitzharris
Can We Calculate Fairness And Reasonableness? Determining What Satisfies The Fair Cross-Section Requirement Of The Sixth Amendment, Colleen P. Fitzharris
Michigan Law Review
The Impartial Jury Clause of the Sixth Amendment requires that the venire from which the state and the defendant draw a twelve-person petit jury be a fair cross-section of the community. The Supreme Court announced a three-prong test in Duren v. Missouri to help courts determine whether there has been a Sixth Amendment violation: (1) whether a distinctive group in the community was excluded; (2) whether the venire was not a fair and reasonable representation of the county population as a whole; and (3) whether that underrepresentation was the result of systematic exclusion. When evaluating the second prong, courts routinely …
Immigration Policing And Federalism Through The Lens Of Technology, Surveillance, And Privacy, Anil Kalhan
Immigration Policing And Federalism Through The Lens Of Technology, Surveillance, And Privacy, Anil Kalhan
Anil Kalhan
With the deployment of technology, federal programs to enlist state and local police assistance with immigration enforcement are undergoing a sea change. For example, even as it forcefully has urged invalidation of Arizona’s S.B. 1070 and similar state laws, the Obama administration has presided over the largest expansion of state and local immigration policing in U.S. history with its implementation of the “Secure Communities” program, which integrates immigration and criminal history database systems in order to automatically ascertain the immigration status of every individual who is arrested and booked by state and local police nationwide. By 2012, over one fifth …
Democracy And Renewed Distrust: Equal Protection And The Evolving Judicial Conception Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross
Democracy And Renewed Distrust: Equal Protection And The Evolving Judicial Conception Of Politics, Bertrall L. Ross
Bertrall L Ross
Judicial interpretations of the Equal Protection Clause have undergone a major transformation over the last fifty years. A Supreme Court once suspicious of the democratic losses of discrete and insular minorities, now closely scrutinizes their democratic victories. A Court once active in structuring the democratic process to be inclusive of racial and other minorities, now views minority representation in the political process as essentially irrelevant. A Court once deferential to exercises of congressional power that enhanced the equal protection rights of minorities, now gives Congress much less leeway.
What explains these shifts? An easy explanation is that the Supreme Court …
Constitutional Theory And Political Activism: Theorectical And Practical Problems Related To Social Fundamental Rights, Carlos Luiz Strapazzon, Rodrigo Goldschmidt
Constitutional Theory And Political Activism: Theorectical And Practical Problems Related To Social Fundamental Rights, Carlos Luiz Strapazzon, Rodrigo Goldschmidt
Carlos Luiz Strapazzon
The main purpose of this text is to provide a critical discussion about the use, in legal theory, of the compound term ¨judicial activism¨. The institutional environment of analysis of this work is the Brazilian constitutional democracy, its complete system of fundamental rights and mixed model of constitutionality control. The main hypothesis discussed here is that the contemporary theory of democracy and the fundamental rights, in institutional settings such as Brazil, offers less obscure solutions to explain news forms of judicial performance operated to protect fundamental rights to positive actions. For that purpose, the article analyzes the uses of the …
Rick Garnett Quoted In Washington Post Article "Court Confronts Religious Rights Of Corporations", Richard Garnett
Rick Garnett Quoted In Washington Post Article "Court Confronts Religious Rights Of Corporations", Richard Garnett
Richard W Garnett
Rick Garnett quoted in Washington Post article "Court Confronts Religious Rights of Corporations" by ADAM LIPTAK. “This is a perfect storm,” said Richard Garnett, a law professor at Notre Dame, adding that it is also a worrisome one. “Debates about campaign finance in Citizens United and abortion and Obamacare,” he said, “could distort the court’s analysis of religious freedom.”
Rick Garnett Quoted In Ncr Article "Supreme Court Takes Up Contraceptive Mandate, Will Rule On Religious Rights Of Corporations", Richard Garnett
Rick Garnett Quoted In Ncr Article "Supreme Court Takes Up Contraceptive Mandate, Will Rule On Religious Rights Of Corporations", Richard Garnett
Richard W Garnett
Rick Garnett quoted in NCR article by David Gibson "Supreme Court takes up contraceptive mandate, will rule on religious rights of corporations" on November 26, 2013. Given the polemics, Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett said he worries "that what I regard as accidental aspects of the case -- the Citizens United debate, the 'war on women' rhetoric from the last election, the controversies about (health care reform) -- will distract the court from the more specific legal question presented, which has to do, again, with the interpretation of a particular, and an important, federal statute."
November 28, 2013: The Theology Of The Disappearance Of Thanksgiving, Bruce Ledewitz
November 28, 2013: The Theology Of The Disappearance Of Thanksgiving, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Theology of the Disappearance of Thanksgiving“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Dispatches From The Trenches Of America's Great Gun Trust Wars, Lee-Ford Tritt
Dispatches From The Trenches Of America's Great Gun Trust Wars, Lee-Ford Tritt
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Stretching Religious Liberty, Bruce Ledewitz
Stretching Religious Liberty, Bruce Ledewitz
Ledewitz Papers
Published scholarship collected from academic journals, law reviews, newspaper publications & online periodicals
Children, Parents & The State: The Construction Of A New Family Ideology, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Children, Parents & The State: The Construction Of A New Family Ideology, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Deseriee A. Kennedy
More than twenty-five states allow courts to consider parental incarceration or conviction of a crime in determining whether to terminate parental rights. This problem is of increasing significance as a result of dramatic growth in incarceration rates, particularly among women who were often the primary and sole caretaker of their children before their imprisonment. Social scientists have recognized that the reality for parents in many communities is one of widespread and repeated incarceration, which has a devastating effect on families and communities. The problem is magnified by a failed drug policy and the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which, in …