Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Garnett (6)
- Law & Religion (6)
- Prayer (5)
-
- Constitutional law (4)
- Dispute Resolution (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Popular Press (4)
- Arbitration (3)
- Bradley (3)
- Civil Rights (3)
- Constitution (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Law (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Religion (3)
- Surveillance (3)
- Abortion (2)
- Contraception coverage (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Cruel and unusual punishment (2)
- Establishment Clause (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Hosanna-Tabor (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Medical Jurisprudence (2)
- Political Theory (2)
- Publication
-
- Michael A Helfand (6)
- Richard W Garnett (6)
- Patrick McKinley Brennan (5)
- Anil Kalhan (4)
- Charles H. Baron (4)
-
- Erik Luna (4)
- Gerard V. Bradley (4)
- Kent Greenfield (4)
- Mark Graber (2)
- Martha F. Davis (2)
- Richard Daniel Klein (2)
- Robert Bloom (2)
- Andrew Blair-Stanek (1)
- David C. Gray (1)
- David DeMatteo (1)
- Edward Lee (1)
- Eileen Kaufman (1)
- Fletcher N. Baldwin (1)
- Javier E Revelo-Rebolledo (1)
- Jennifer Daskal (1)
- Jimmy Gurule (1)
- Luke A. Boso (1)
- Mark P. McKenna (1)
- Richard J. Peltz-Steele (1)
- Robert M. Sanger (1)
- Scott W. Howe (1)
- Susan Freiwald (1)
- Thomas L. Shaffer (1)
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Litigating Religion, Michael A. Helfand
Litigating Religion, Michael A. Helfand
Michael A Helfand
This article considers how parties should resolve disputes that turn on religious doctrine and practice – that is, how people should litigate religion. Under current constitutional doctrine, litigating religion is generally the task of two types of religious institutions: first, religious arbitration tribunals, whose decisions are protected by arbitration doctrine, and religious courts, whose decision are protected by the religion clauses. Such institutions have been thrust into playing this role largely because the religion clauses are currently understood to prohibit courts from resolving religious questions – that is, the “religious question” doctrine is currently understood to prohibit courts from litigating …