Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (104)
- Constitutional History (41)
- Constitutional law (25)
- Constitution (22)
- First Amendment (21)
-
- Supreme Court (17)
- Law and Society (16)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- ‘nature of government’ reasoning (12)
- Federalism (11)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Politics (10)
- Religion (10)
- Quantum values (9)
- Fourth Amendment (8)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (8)
- Courts (7)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (7)
- Judicial review (7)
- Due process (6)
- Equal protection (6)
- Federal convention (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Fourth amendment (6)
- Human Rights (6)
- Human rights (6)
- Law (6)
- Civil Rights (5)
- Death penalty (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Publication
-
- Peter J. Aschenbrenner (40)
- Richard W Garnett (10)
- Alan E Garfield (9)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (9)
- Daniel A Farber (8)
-
- Germán M. Teruel Lozano (7)
- Robert Bloom (6)
- Gerard V. Bradley (5)
- John Copeland Nagle (5)
- Stephen E Henderson (5)
- Jesse H Choper (4)
- Shubhankar Dam (4)
- Alexander Tsesis (3)
- Anthony J. Bellia (3)
- Barry Cushman (3)
- Beatriz Ramirez (3)
- Deirdre M Bowen (3)
- Jose Luis Sardon (3)
- Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba (3)
- Martin A. Schwartz (3)
- Melissa Murray (3)
- Patricia E. Salkin (3)
- Robert Rodes (3)
- Samuel W. Calhoun (3)
- Ann MacLean Massie (2)
- Carolyn Shapiro (2)
- Danielle Keats Citron (2)
- David C. Gray (2)
- David Ingram (2)
- Fletcher N. Baldwin (2)
Articles 301 - 302 of 302
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
A Mistake Of Law Defense As A Remedy For Overcriminalization, Paul J. Larkin Jr.
A Mistake Of Law Defense As A Remedy For Overcriminalization, Paul J. Larkin Jr.
Paul J Larkin Jr.
No abstract provided.
Founding Era Conventions And The Constitution's "Convention For Proposing Amendments", Robert G. Natelson
Founding Era Conventions And The Constitution's "Convention For Proposing Amendments", Robert G. Natelson
Robert G. Natelson
Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, two thirds of state legislatures may require Congress to call a “Convention for proposing Amendments.” Because this procedure has never been used, commentators frequently debate the composition of the convention and the rules governing the application and convention process. However, the debate has proceeded almost entirely without knowledge of the many multi-colony and multi-state conventions held during the eighteenth century, of which the Constitutional Convention was only one. These conventions were governed by universally-accepted convention practices and protocols. This Article surveys those conventions and shows how their practices and protocols shaped the meaning …