Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Psychiatric and Mental Health Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Mental illness (2)
- Antipsychotic medication (1)
- Broken promises (1)
- Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking Constitutional and Tort Liability Aspects of the Right of the Institutionalized Mentally Disabled to Refuse Treatment (1)
- Child (1)
-
- Civil commitment (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional litigation (1)
- Courts (1)
- DCYF (1)
- DHHS (1)
- Deinstitutionalization (1)
- Developmental (1)
- Disabilities (1)
- Disability (1)
- Garrity (1)
- IDEA (1)
- IEP (1)
- Institutionalization (1)
- Involuntarily committed (1)
- Involuntary psychiatric commitment (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Juvenile (1)
- Mental health (1)
- Mental health unit (1)
- Mentally ill (1)
- Michael L. Perlin (1)
- Mills v. Rogers (1)
- New Hampshire (1)
- Nh (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Psychiatric and Mental Health
Broken Promises: The Granite State’S Return To The Institutionalization Of Children With Disabilities, Elizabeth Trautz
Broken Promises: The Granite State’S Return To The Institutionalization Of Children With Disabilities, Elizabeth Trautz
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
In 1975, the New Hampshire legislature enacted a progressive statute which mandated the Department of Health and Human Services “to establish, maintain, implement and coordinate a comprehensive service delivery system for developmentally disabled persons.” This law was innovative for its time; it decreed that individual service plans (ISPs) be developed for every client in the state’s service delivery system, guaranteed “a right to adequate and humane habilitation and treatment[,]” and contemplated the state’s area agency system as we know it today. The statute was a steppingstone for the 1981 class action lawsuit of Garrity v. Gallen. This was one of …
Mentally Ill, Or Mentally Ill And Dangerous?: Rethinking Civil Commitments In Minnesota, Eliot T. Tracz
Mentally Ill, Or Mentally Ill And Dangerous?: Rethinking Civil Commitments In Minnesota, Eliot T. Tracz
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.