Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences
Patient Experience And Challenges In Group Concept Mapping For Clinical Research., Geoffrey D. Mills, Marianna Lanoue, Alexzandra T. Gentsch, Amanda M.B. Doty, Amy Cunningham, Garrison Nord, Kristin L. Rising
Patient Experience And Challenges In Group Concept Mapping For Clinical Research., Geoffrey D. Mills, Marianna Lanoue, Alexzandra T. Gentsch, Amanda M.B. Doty, Amy Cunningham, Garrison Nord, Kristin L. Rising
Department of Emergency Medicine Faculty Papers
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Group concept mapping (GCM) is a research method that engages stakeholders in generating, structuring and representing ideas around a specific topic or question. GCM has been used with patients to answer questions related to health and disease but little is known about the patient experience as a participant in the process. This paper explores the patient experience participating in GCM as assessed with direct observation and surveys of participants.
METHODS: This is a secondary analysis performed within a larger study in which 3 GCM iterations were performed to engage patients in identifying patient-important outcomes for diabetes care. …
The Power Of The Group: Comparison Of Interviews And Group Concept Mapping For Identifying Patient-Important Outcomes Of Care., Kristin L. Rising, Marianna Lanoue, Alexzandra Gentsch, Amanda Doty, Amy Cunningham, Brendan G. Carr, Judd E. Hollander, Lori Latimer, Larry Loebell, Gail Weingarten, Neva White, Geoffrey Mills
The Power Of The Group: Comparison Of Interviews And Group Concept Mapping For Identifying Patient-Important Outcomes Of Care., Kristin L. Rising, Marianna Lanoue, Alexzandra Gentsch, Amanda Doty, Amy Cunningham, Brendan G. Carr, Judd E. Hollander, Lori Latimer, Larry Loebell, Gail Weingarten, Neva White, Geoffrey Mills
Department of Emergency Medicine Faculty Papers
BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding how to effectively and efficiently identify patient priorities for research or clinical care. Our goal was to compare the comprehensiveness and efficiency of group concept mapping (GCM), a group participatory method, to interviews for identifying patient goals when seeking care.
METHODS: We engaged patients with moderately- to poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus in either GCM or an individual interview. The primary outcome was the comprehensiveness of GCM brainstorming (the first stage of GCM) as compared to interviews for eliciting patient-important outcomes (PIOs) related to seeking care. Secondary outcomes included 1) comprehensiveness of GCM brainstorming and interviews compared …