Medicine and Health Sciences Commons^™

Development And Preliminary Clinical Activity Of Pd-1-Guided Ctla-4 Blocking Bispecific Dart Molecule., Alexey Berezhnoy, Bradley J Sumrow, Kurt Stahl, Kalpana Shah, Daorong Liu, Jonathan Li, Su-Shin Hao, Anushka De Costa, Sanjeev Kaul, Johanna Bendell, Gregory M Cote, Jason J Luke, Rachel E Sanborn, Manish R Sharma, Francine Chen, Hua Li, Gundo Diedrich, Ezio Bonvini, Paul A Moore

Articles, Abstracts, and Reports

Combination immunotherapy with antibodies directed against PD-1 and CTLA-4 shows improved clinical benefit across cancer indications compared to single agents, albeit with increased toxicity. Leveraging the observation that PD-1 and CTLA-4 are co-expressed by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, an investigational PD-1 x CTLA-4 bispecific DART molecule, MGD019, is engineered to maximize checkpoint blockade in the tumor microenvironment via enhanced CTLA-4 blockade in a PD-1-binding-dependent manner.

Nivolumab In Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Safety Profile And Select Treatment-Related Adverse Events From The Checkmate 040 Study., Karen Julien, Hiu Tung Leung, Carmen Fuertes, Megumi Mori, Miao-Jen Wang, Jocelyn Teo, Lisa Weiss, Sara Hamilton, Holly Difebo, Yoon Jin Noh, Aralee Galway, Jane Koh, Edith Brutcher, Huanyu Zhao, Yun Shen, Marina Tschaika, Yue-Yun To

Articles, Abstracts, and Reports

BACKGROUND: CheckMate 040 assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Understanding the safety profile of nivolumab is needed to support the management of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). This analysis assessed the safety of nivolumab monotherapy in the phase I/II, open-label CheckMate 040 study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Select TRAEs (sTRAEs; TRAEs with potential immunologic etiology requiring more frequent monitoring) occurring between first dose and 30 days after last dose were analyzed in patients in the dose-escalation and -expansion phases. Time to onset (TTO), time to resolution (TTR), and recurrence of sTRAEs were assessed, and …

Patient And Physician Predictors Of Ffr/Ifr Utilization In Acs And Sihd, Payal Kohli, Peiqi Wang, Andrew Wang, Lucy Liu, Ali Weinstein, Jeptha P. Curtis, John A. Spertus, Jonathan P. Piccini, Marty Makary, Tyler J Gluckman

Articles, Abstracts, and Reports

Background

Despite guidelines supporting FFR/iFR to guide PCI, these modalities remain underutilized. We sought to characterize factors associated with FFR/iFR use in patients undergoing index PCI for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD).

Methods

ICD-9/10 codes were used to identify patients undergoing PCI and receiving FFR/iFR for an ACS (n=1,042,896) or SIHD (n=255,213) in a Medicare claims database from Jan. 1, 2013-June 30, 2018. Patients with functional/anatomical testing were excluded (5d prior in ACS; 60d prior in SIHD). Individuals with FFR/iFR performed 1-60 days prior to PCI were also excluded to limit analysis to non-staged …