Medicine and Health Sciences Commons^™

Routine Use Of Closed Suction Drains Following Revision Arthroplasty May Not Be Necessary, Farideh Najafi, Jonah M. Stein, Nicholas V. Peterson, Michael Meghpara, Matthew B. Sherman, Camilo Restrepo, Javad Parvizi

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers

BACKGROUND: There are numerous studies demonstrating that closed suction drainage (CSD) usage after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has little to no benefit. There are little data on the role of CSDs after revision TJA. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether there is any clinical advantage to CSD usage after revision TJA.

METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the clinical records of 2,030 patients undergoing revision TJA between 2007 and 2021. CSD was used in 472 patients and not used in 1,558 patients. Primary outcome was blood transfusion rate and secondary outcomes included total blood loss (TBL), as …

Causes Of Early Hip Revision Vary By Age And Sex: Analysis Of Data From A Statewide Quality Registry, Jacob F. Markel, John A. Driscoll, Richard Hughes, Jamers Verner, Thomas Zheng, Brian Halstrom, David C. Markel

Conference Presentation Abstracts

INTRODUCTION: While THA is extremely successful, early failures do occur. The purpose of this study was to determine the cause of revision in specific patient demographic groups at three timepoints to improve quality. The data should guide treatment regimens and implant choice. METHODS: Data for cases performed between 2012 and 2018 from a statewide, quality improvement arthroplasty registry was used. The database included 79,205 THA cases and 1,433 revisions with identified etiology (1,584 total). All revisions performed at < 5 years from the primary THA were reviewed. Six groups: men/women, <65, 65-75, and >75 years, were compared at revision timepoints <6 mo, <1 year, and <5 years. RESULTS: There were obvious and significant differences between subgroups based on demographics and timepoints (p<.0001). The most common etiologies within 1 year (961 revisions) were: fracture (324, 33.7%), dislocation (235, 24.5%) and infection (164, 17.0%). 756 (78%) of the 1-year revisions occurred within 6 months, the vast majority within 6 weeks. At this early timepoint, the most common revision cause was fracture for all groups and ages (316, 42%) ranging from 27.6% in young men to 60% in older women. Joint instability became the leading cause for revision after 6 months in younger women whereas for younger men infection became the primary issue. The most striking finding was the incidence of fracture as the leading cause of revision at all time points for both men and women >75 years. CONCLUSION: This quality project demonstrated clinically significant differences in the reason for THA …