Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medicine and Health Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Journal Articles

Retrospective Studies

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences

Contemporary Analysis Of Reexcision And Conversion To Mastectomy Rates And Associated Healthcare Costs For Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery, Youngran Kim, Cecilia Ganduglia-Cazaban, Nina Tamirisa, Anthony Lucci, Trudy Millard Krause Jun 2024

Contemporary Analysis Of Reexcision And Conversion To Mastectomy Rates And Associated Healthcare Costs For Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery, Youngran Kim, Cecilia Ganduglia-Cazaban, Nina Tamirisa, Anthony Lucci, Trudy Millard Krause

Journal Articles

PURPOSE: This study was designed to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of population-level reoperation rates and incremental healthcare costs associated with reoperation for patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using Merative™ MarketScan

RESULTS: The commercial cohort included 17,129 women with a median age of 55 (interquartile range [IQR] 49-59) years, and the Medicare cohort included 6977 women with a median age of 73 (IQR 69-78) years. Overall reoperation rates were 21.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.5-21.8%) for the commercial cohort and 14.9% (95% CI 14.1-15.7%) for the Medicare cohort. In both cohorts, …


Disparities In Fertility-Sparing Treatment And Use Of Assisted Reproductive Technology After A Diagnosis Of Cervical, Ovarian, Or Endometrial Cancer, Kirsten Jorgensen, Clare Meernik, Chi-Fang Wu, Caitlin C Murphy, Valerie L Baker, Peiton Jarmon, Paula C Brady, Roni Nitecki, Hazel B Nichols, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain Feb 2023

Disparities In Fertility-Sparing Treatment And Use Of Assisted Reproductive Technology After A Diagnosis Of Cervical, Ovarian, Or Endometrial Cancer, Kirsten Jorgensen, Clare Meernik, Chi-Fang Wu, Caitlin C Murphy, Valerie L Baker, Peiton Jarmon, Paula C Brady, Roni Nitecki, Hazel B Nichols, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain

Journal Articles

OBJECTIVE: to assess the presence of sociodemographic and clinical disparities in fertility-sparing treatment and assisted reproductive technology (ART) use among patients with a history of cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer.

METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients aged 18-45 years who were diagnosed with cervical cancer (stage IA, IB), endometrial cancer (grade 1, stage IA, IB), or ovarian cancer (stage IA, IC) between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, using linked data from the CCR (California Cancer Registry), the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The primary outcome …


Do Breast Cancer Survivors With A Recent History Of Clinical Depression Report Worse Experiences With Care? A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Seer-Cahps Data, Mariana Arevalo, Trevor A Pickering, Sally W Vernon, Kayo Fujimoto, Melissa F Peskin, Albert J Farias Jan 2023

Do Breast Cancer Survivors With A Recent History Of Clinical Depression Report Worse Experiences With Care? A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Seer-Cahps Data, Mariana Arevalo, Trevor A Pickering, Sally W Vernon, Kayo Fujimoto, Melissa F Peskin, Albert J Farias

Journal Articles

PURPOSE: We examined whether breast cancer survivors' experiences with care differed by a recent history of clinical depression, and whether associations differed by race/ethnicity.

METHODS: Using the Epidemiology and End Results-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (SEER-CAHPS) dataset, we analyzed records of breast cancer survivors who completed a survey at least 12 months after their cancer diagnosis. We assessed clinical depression 12 months prior to survey completion using Medicare claims. We used separate multivariable logistic regressions to examine the associations between depression and excellent (vs. less than excellent) ratings of experiences with care (i.e., doctor communication, getting needed care, …