Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences
Sustained Response To Atogepant In Episodic Migraine: Post Hoc Analyses Of A 12-Week Randomized Trial And A 52-Week Long-Term Safety Trial, Richard Lipton, Stephanie J. Nahas, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Tanya Bilchik, Peter Mcallister, Michelle Finnegan, Yingyi Liu, Natty Chalermpalanupap, Brett Dabruzzo, David Dodick
Sustained Response To Atogepant In Episodic Migraine: Post Hoc Analyses Of A 12-Week Randomized Trial And A 52-Week Long-Term Safety Trial, Richard Lipton, Stephanie J. Nahas, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Tanya Bilchik, Peter Mcallister, Michelle Finnegan, Yingyi Liu, Natty Chalermpalanupap, Brett Dabruzzo, David Dodick
Department of Neurology Faculty Papers
BACKGROUND: Atogepant is an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. These analyses evaluated the proportions of clinical trial participants who experienced sustained responses to atogepant over 12 or 52 weeks of treatment.
METHODS: These were post hoc analyses of ADVANCE, a 12-week, double-blind, randomized trial of atogepant 10, 30, and 60 mg once daily vs. placebo for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine, and a separate open-label long-term safety (LTS) trial of atogepant 60 mg once daily over 52 weeks. The 60 mg dose of atogepant was used to detect safety …
Comparative Efficacy, Quality Of Life, Safety, And Tolerability Of Atogepant And Rimegepant In Migraine Prevention: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Analysis, Cristina Tassorelli, Kateryna Onishchenko, Rashmi B. Halker Singh, Molly Duan, Laure Dupont-Benjamin, Matthew Hemstock, Corey Voller, Peter Mcallister, Stephanie J. Nahas, Pranav Gandhi, Jessica Ailani
Comparative Efficacy, Quality Of Life, Safety, And Tolerability Of Atogepant And Rimegepant In Migraine Prevention: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Analysis, Cristina Tassorelli, Kateryna Onishchenko, Rashmi B. Halker Singh, Molly Duan, Laure Dupont-Benjamin, Matthew Hemstock, Corey Voller, Peter Mcallister, Stephanie J. Nahas, Pranav Gandhi, Jessica Ailani
Department of Neurology Faculty Papers
BACKGROUND: Comparative evaluations of preventive migraine treatments can help inform clinical decision making for managing migraine in clinical practice.
METHODS: An anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis was conducted using pooled participant-level data from two phase 3 atogepant trials (ADVANCE and PROGRESS) and one phase 2/3 rimegepant trial (BHV3000-305) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety/tolerability of atogepant and rimegepant as preventive migraine treatments. Participants receiving atogepant 60 mg once daily, rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet 75 mg once every other day, and placebo were included. Only participants meeting the BHV3000-305 inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed: ≥6 monthly migraine days and ≤18 monthly …