Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medicine and Health Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medical Sciences

2019

Journal

Validity

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Medicine and Health Sciences

Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (Ipat): Turkish Validity And Reliability Study, Berker Duman, Zeynep Kotan, Vahap Ozan Kotan, Nevzat Mehmet Mutlu, Beyza Doğanay Erdoğan, Damla Sayar Akaslan, Safi̇ye Zeynep Tatli, Hakan Kumbasar Jan 2019

Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (Ipat): Turkish Validity And Reliability Study, Berker Duman, Zeynep Kotan, Vahap Ozan Kotan, Nevzat Mehmet Mutlu, Beyza Doğanay Erdoğan, Damla Sayar Akaslan, Safi̇ye Zeynep Tatli, Hakan Kumbasar

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Background/aim: It is of crucial importantance to be able to detect acute psychological distress in patients. The Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT) was developed for this purpose in intensive care units. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IPAT.Materials and methods: In total, 98 patients were included. To assess concurrent validity, the Intensive Care Experiences Scale (ICES) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale were performed. Cronbach?s alpha coefficient was used to estimate internal consistency. Interitem and item-total score correlations were also performed. Sensitivity and specificity were derived for concurrent anxiety and depression.Results: …


Validity And Reliability Of The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety And Information Scale In The Turkish Population, Funda Çeti̇nkaya, Esi̇n Kavuran, Kevser Sevgi̇ Ünal Aslan Jan 2019

Validity And Reliability Of The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety And Information Scale In The Turkish Population, Funda Çeti̇nkaya, Esi̇n Kavuran, Kevser Sevgi̇ Ünal Aslan

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

This study aimed to adapt the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) to measure the preoperative anxiety of adult Turkish patients undergoing surgery.Materials and methods: The sample of this methodological study included 210 patients. Data were collected by using personal information forms, the APAIS, and the State Anxiety Scale (STAI). Cronbach's ∝-coefficient was calculated, and test-retest reliability was tested. Results: Cronbach's ∝-coefficients of the APAIS anxiety and information requirement subscales were 0.897 and 0.786, respectively. The mean test and retest scores of the APAIS were not different. The test and retest scores of the patients were significantly, positively, and …


Reliability, Validity, And Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study Of The Turkish Version Of The Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation Questionnaire, Deni̇z Öke Topcu, Sevği̇ İkbali̇ Afşar Jan 2019

Reliability, Validity, And Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study Of The Turkish Version Of The Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation Questionnaire, Deni̇z Öke Topcu, Sevği̇ İkbali̇ Afşar

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (T-PRWHE) questionnaire for use in the Turkish patient population. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the T-PRWHE questionnaire. Materials and methods: A total of 166 patients with hand and wrist problems were included in the study. They completed the T-PRWHE, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and at the 3rd month of the study. Reliability was evaluated by analyzing internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient) and …


Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, And Validity Of The Turkish Version Of The Neck Outcome Score, Şeyda Candeni̇z, Seyi̇t Çitaker, Batuhan Bakirarar Jan 2019

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, And Validity Of The Turkish Version Of The Neck Outcome Score, Şeyda Candeni̇z, Seyi̇t Çitaker, Batuhan Bakirarar

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Background/aim: This study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score (NOOS).Materials and methods: Two hundred eight patients suffering from nonspecific neck pain participated in the study. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (2, 1) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. The dimensionality was investigated with the factor analysis. The construct validity was determined by testing whether the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, Short Form-36 subscales, and the Neck Disability Index were met using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Ceiling/floor effects and measurement error were tested as well.Results: The …