Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Clean Water Act (2)
- Waters of the United States (2)
- 1907 Hague Regulations (1)
- Abnormally dangerous activities (1)
- Abnormally dangerous activity (1)
-
- Absentee landowners (1)
- Ahed Tamimi (1)
- American industrialization (1)
- Appalachia (1)
- Appalachian landowner (1)
- Arab–Israeli War (1)
- Army Corps of Engineers (1)
- Army Corps of Engineers vs. EPA (1)
- Belligerent occupation (1)
- Best technology (1)
- Blockade (1)
- Breathitt (1)
- Broad form deed (1)
- Buchanan v. Watson (1)
- Coal (1)
- Coal industry (1)
- Coal mining (1)
- Coal slurry (1)
- Community health (1)
- Customary International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Declaration of London (1)
- Declaration of Paris (1)
- Department of Defense (1)
- EPA (1)
- East Jerusalem (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Water Law
The Failure Of International Law In Palestine, Svetlana Sumina, Steven Gilmore
The Failure Of International Law In Palestine, Svetlana Sumina, Steven Gilmore
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming
Take This Job And Shove It: The Pragmatic Philosophy Of Johnny Paycheck And A Prayer For Strict Liability In Appalachia, Eugene "Trey" Moore Iii
Take This Job And Shove It: The Pragmatic Philosophy Of Johnny Paycheck And A Prayer For Strict Liability In Appalachia, Eugene "Trey" Moore Iii
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming
National Association Of Manufacturers V. Department Of Defense, Summer L. Carmack
National Association Of Manufacturers V. Department Of Defense, Summer L. Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In an attempt to provide consistency to the interpretation and application of the statutory phrase “waters of the United States,” as used in the Clean Water Act, the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers together passed the WOTUS Rule. Unfortunately, the Rule has created more confusion than clarity, resulting in a number of lawsuits challenging substantive portions of the Rule’s language. National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense did not address those substantive challenges, but instead determined whether those claims challenging the Rule must be filed in federal district courts or federal courts of appeals. In its decision, the …