Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Economics (2)
-
- Education Law (2)
- Elder Law (2)
- Employment Practice (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- General Law (2)
- Housing Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Labor Law (2)
- Land Use Planning (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Medical Jurisprudence (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Practice and Procedure (2)
- Property-Personal and Real (2)
- RICO (2)
- Taxation (2)
- Taxation-Transnational (2)
- Water Law (2)
- Accounting (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Agency (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Taxation-Transnational
Ley Federal Del Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo., Bruno L. Costantini García
Ley Federal Del Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo., Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Ponencia sobre la Ley Federal del Procedimiento Contencioso Administrativo, impartida por Bruno L. Costantini García.
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
Primer Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Primer Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Memorias del Primer Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autonomos
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
By now we all are familiar with the litany of cases which refused to find elevated scrutiny for so-called “affirmative” or “social” rights such as education, welfare or housing: Lindsey v. Normet, San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, Dandridge v. Williams, DeShaney v. Winnebago County. There didn’t seem to be anything in minimum scrutiny which could protect such facts as education or housing, from government action. However, unobtrusively and over the years, the Supreme Court has clarified and articulated one aspect of minimum scrutiny which holds promise for vindicating facts. You will recall that under minimum scrutiny government’s action is …