Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- AIDS (1)
- AIDS legislation (1)
- Confidential (1)
- Cyber searches (1)
- Cyberlaw (1)
-
- Discrimination (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- HIPAA (1)
- Health care (1)
- Michelle Zakarin (1)
- Officer inadvertence (1)
- Patient (1)
- Patient privacy (1)
- Physician (1)
- Plain view doctrine (1)
- Protect (1)
- Requiring What’s Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent and Revisiting Officer Inadvertence in Cyberlaw Cases (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Technology (1)
- Third parties (1)
- Zakarin (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
Confidentiality, Warning And Aids: A Proposal To Protect Patients, Third Parties And Physicians
Confidentiality, Warning And Aids: A Proposal To Protect Patients, Third Parties And Physicians
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Requiring What’S Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent And Revisiting Officer Inadvertence In Cyberlaw Cases, Michelle Zakarin
Requiring What’S Not Required: Circuit Courts Are Disregarding Supreme Court Precedent And Revisiting Officer Inadvertence In Cyberlaw Cases, Michelle Zakarin
Scholarly Works
As the age of technology has taken this country by surprise and left us with an inability to formally prepare our legal system to incorporate these advances, many courts are forced to adapt by applying pre-technology rules to new technological scenarios. One illustration is the plain view exception to the Fourth Amendment. Recently, the issue of officer inadvertence at the time of the search, a rule that the United States Supreme Court has specifically stated is not required in plain view inquiries, has been revisited in cyber law cases. It could be said that the courts interested in the existence …