Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Lawrence v. Texas (2)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Character-based retribution (1)
- Civil rights (1)
-
- Columbia Law Review (1)
- Constitutional privacy (1)
- Contactless (1)
- Coronavirus (1)
- Essential goods (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Gay and lesbian (1)
- Gay marriage (1)
- Gay rights (1)
- Hate speech (1)
- Health crisis (1)
- Judicial protection (1)
- Law (1)
- Legal formalism (1)
- Lock down (1)
- Metaprivacy (1)
- Moral judgment (1)
- No contact (1)
- Novel corona virus (1)
- Pandemic (1)
- Penal law (1)
- Privatized liberty (1)
- Public health (1)
- Public threat (1)
- Quarantine (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
Law In The Time Of Covid-19, Katharina Pistor
Law In The Time Of Covid-19, Katharina Pistor
Faculty Books
The COVID-19 crisis has ended and upended lives around the globe. In addition to killing over 160,000 people, more than 35,000 in the United States alone, its secondary effects have been as devastating. These secondary effects pose fundamental challenges to the rules that govern our social, political, and economic lives. These rules are the domain of lawyers. Law in the Time of COVID-19 is the product of a joint effort by members of the faculty of Columbia Law School and several law professors from other schools.
This volume offers guidance for thinking about some the most pressing legal issues the …
Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy And Punishment, Jamal Greene
Beyond Lawrence: Metaprivacy And Punishment, Jamal Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Lawrence v. Texas remains, after three years of precedential life, an opinion in search of a principle. It is both libertarian – Randy Barnett has called it the constitutionalization of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty – and communitarian – William Eskridge has described it as the gay rights movement's Brown v. Board of Education. It is simultaneously broad, in its evocation of our deepest spiritual commitments, and narrow, in its self-conscious attempts to avoid condemning laws against same-sex marriage, prostitution, and bestiality. This Article reconciles these competing claims on Lawrence's jurisprudential legacy. In Part I, it defends the …
The Domesticated Liberty Of Lawrence V. Texas, Katherine M. Franke
The Domesticated Liberty Of Lawrence V. Texas, Katherine M. Franke
Faculty Scholarship
In this Commentary, Professor Franke offers an account of the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas. She concludes that in overruling the earlier Bowers v. Hardwick decision, Justice Kennedy does not rely upon a robust form of freedom made available by the Court's earlier reproductive rights cases, but instead announces a kind of privatized liberty right that affords gay and lesbian couples the right to intimacy in the bedroom. In this sense, the rights-holders in Lawrence are people in relationships and the liberty right those couples enjoy does not extend beyond the domain of the private. Franke expresses …