Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Edwarn Snowden; Metadata; Personal privacy; National Security Agency (NSA); Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ); United States of America (USA); United Kingdom (UK); European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR); European Convention on Rights (ECHR); Investigatory Powers Tribunal; Britain; British Parliament; Telecommunications Act of 1984; American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU); USA PATROIT Act; Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000; International human rights; Communications data; Confidential information; Disclosure of Communications Data Code of Practice; Surveillance program; Freedom of expression; National security; United Nation's Human Rights Council; United Nations General Assembly; First Amendment; United States Constitution; Jouralist; Jouralism (1)
- European Court of Justice; Google Spain v. AEPD and Mario Costeja González; Google; Commission National de l'Informatique des Libertés; Consumers; Search engines; European Union; Internet Protocol; Martin v. Hearst Corporation; United States Supreme Court; Data Protection Directive; Direct 95/46/EC; Privacy; Internet; U.S. Citizens; Freedom of privacy; Freedom of speech; Universal Declaration of Human Rights; European Parliament; Globalization; European Commission; United States; Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Griswold v. Connecticut; Right to be forgotten; Data Protection Working Party; Miller v. California; First Amendment (1)
- General Data Protection Regulation; Data Protection; European Union; U.S. Surveillance Practices; National Security Agency; NSA; Small Business; European Data Privacy Law; Transatlantic Data Transfer; Data Protection Authorities (1)
- International privacy law (1)
- Search warrants (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
What About Small Businesses? The Gdpr And Its Consequences For Small U.S.-Based Companies, Craig Mcallister
What About Small Businesses? The Gdpr And Its Consequences For Small U.S.-Based Companies, Craig Mcallister
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Fast-approaching changes to European data privacy law will have consequences around the globe. Historically, despite having dramatically different approaches to data privacy and data protection, the European Union and the United States developed a framework to ensure that the highspeed freeway that is transatlantic data transfer moved uninterrupted. That framework was overturned in the wake of revelations regarding U.S. surveillance practices, and amidst skepticism that the United States did not adequately protect personal data. Further, the European Union enacted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a sweeping overhaul of the legal data protection landscape that will take effect in May …
The Scrivener’S Secrets Seen Through The Spyglass: Gchq And The International Right To Journalistic Expression, Matthew B. Hurowitz
The Scrivener’S Secrets Seen Through The Spyglass: Gchq And The International Right To Journalistic Expression, Matthew B. Hurowitz
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
As part of the U.K.’s electronic surveillance program, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), started in 1909 to combat German Spies, now collects metadata from both foreigners and its own citizens. Through the express statutory authority of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act of 2000 (RIPA), and a loophole in section 94 of the Telecommunications Act of 1984, the GCHQ collects metadata, which is all of the information that is extrinsic to the actual contents of a communication. The GCHQ can request an authorization from a public authority—a member of its own staff—to collect traffic data, service use information, or subscriber …
Rule 41 Amendments Provide For A Drastic Expansion Of Government Authority To Conduct Computer Searches And Should Not Have Been Adopted By The Supreme Court, Markus Rauschecker
Rule 41 Amendments Provide For A Drastic Expansion Of Government Authority To Conduct Computer Searches And Should Not Have Been Adopted By The Supreme Court, Markus Rauschecker
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privacy Law That Does Not Protect Privacy, Forgetting The Right To Be Forgotten, Mckay Cunningham
Privacy Law That Does Not Protect Privacy, Forgetting The Right To Be Forgotten, Mckay Cunningham
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Looking Backward, Moving Forward: What Must Be Remembered When Resolving The Right To Be Forgotten, Katherine Stewart
Looking Backward, Moving Forward: What Must Be Remembered When Resolving The Right To Be Forgotten, Katherine Stewart
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
In May 2014, the European Court of Justice decided Google Spain v. AEPD and González and granted citizens the right to be forgotten, rather, the right to request any search engine offering services to European consumers to remove certain results displayed after a search of a citizen’s name. This decision has also resulted in an ongoing battle between Google and the Commission Nationale de l’Infomatique et des Libertés (CNIL), France’s data protection authority. The CNIL believes that Google must apply the right to be forgotten to all domains worldwide, including Google.com. Google, however, has been reluctant to do so, given …