Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Autodial (1)
- Autodialer (1)
- Call (1)
- Calling (1)
- Capacity (1)
-
- Class action (1)
- Consumers (1)
- FCC (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (1)
- General Data Protection Regulation; Data Protection; European Union; U.S. Surveillance Practices; National Security Agency; NSA; Small Business; European Data Privacy Law; Transatlantic Data Transfer; Data Protection Authorities (1)
- Prerecorded voice message (1)
- Privacy law; Cybersecurity; Hackers; FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.; Data breaches; Data security procedures; Self-regulatory organizations (SROs); Financial Trade Commission (FTC); Corporate privacy; Cyber Crime; Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act; Deceptive or unfair business practice; Congressional inaction; Key principles of compliance; Best Practices Guidelines; Cyber risk insurance; Commercial general liability (CGL) insurance; First party cyber loss; Third party cyber liability; Technical policies and procedures; Written information security plan (WISP) (1)
- Privacy; Data Privacy; Privacy Law; General Data Protection Regulation; GDPR; California Consumer Privacy Act; CCPA; Privacy Regulation; Cyber Security; Cybercrime; Hackers; Internet; Internet Law; Consumer Protection; Computer Law; International Law; Online Privacy; International Privacy; Brazil Data Privacy; GDPL; Massachusetts Data Privacy; Advertising Technology; Digital Advertising; Advertising; Digital Media; Technology; Media; Digital Marketing; Marketing; eCommerce; Intellectual Property; Compliance; Regulatory Compliance; European Union; EU; California; Data Mapping; Data Brokers; Privacy Rights; Personal Information; Information Commissioner’s Office; ICO; Consent; Opt-In; Opt-Out; Erasure; Internet Protocol Address; IP Address; Regulatory Burdens; Compliance Burdens (1)
- Right of publicity; privacy; data privacy; passing off; trademark; infringement; misappropriation; United Kingdom; UK; United States; US; California; New York; European Union; EU; social media; micro-influencer; intellectual property; IP; data protection; K Data Protection Act; General Data Protection Regulation; GDPR; California Consumer Privacy Act; CCPA; California Privacy Rights Act; CPRA; international; commercial; internet; online; brand; extraterritorial; identity; personal data; publicity; personality; likeness; persona (1)
- Robocall (1)
- Smartphone (1)
- TCPA (1)
- Technology; Internet; European Union; EU Digital Services Act; Democracy; Deliberative Democracy; Public sphere; Marketplace of Ideas; Freedom of Speech; Bubble effect; Filter bubble; Echo Chamber; Age of Communication; Polarization; Recommender systems; Personalized Experiences; Social networks; Search engines; Principle of Proportionality; Media Literacy; Profiling (1)
- Telemarketer (1)
- Telemarketing (1)
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act (1)
- Text (1)
- Texting (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
How (Not) To Deal With The Bubble Effect In Cyberspace: The Case Of The Eu And Digital Services Act, João Tornada
How (Not) To Deal With The Bubble Effect In Cyberspace: The Case Of The Eu And Digital Services Act, João Tornada
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Deliberative democracies are based on an ideal process of speech and dialogue that fosters an “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” public discourse sphere. In cyberspace, social networks and search engine platforms largely operate with recommender systems that tailor content according to the users' interests and online behavior (“profiling”), thus segregating them from different points of view (“bubble effect”). While this personalization of content is particularly efficient to promote commercial goods and services, when it comes to information of common interest, especially on political matters, it undermines consensus-building dialogue and threatens democratic ideals. The theory of a free “marketplace of ideas” justifies …
From The Golden Gate To London: Bridging The Gap Between Data Privacy And The Right Of Publicity, Kristin Kuraishi
From The Golden Gate To London: Bridging The Gap Between Data Privacy And The Right Of Publicity, Kristin Kuraishi
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Currently, there is no global standard or recognition for the right of publicity. Even within the United States, the recognition, scope, and protections vary by state. As the world becomes increasingly reliant on social media for news, information, communication, and recommendations, micro-influencers and non-celebrities require a way to control their developed and curated name, image, and likeness from unauthorized commercial uses by others. Advertising is occurring more frequently online, and brands recognize the power that micro-influencers have on commerce. Some countries, like the United Kingdom, do not recognize the right of publicity, potentially leaving many individuals without recourse for the …
Easing The Burdens Of A Patchwork Approach To Data Privacy Regulation In Favor Of A Singular Comprehensive International Solution—The International Data Privacy Agreement, Scott Resnick
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Data privacy has become one of the premier hot-button issues in today’s increasingly digital human experience. Legislatures around the globe have attempted to act swiftly in an effort to safeguard the highly coveted personal information of their citizens and combat misuse at the hands of international businesses operating with an online presence. Since the European Union’s enactment of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2018, countries around the globe have been grappling with how best to replicate the EU’s leading data privacy regulation while providing the same or greater level of transparency into data collection practices. While a mere …
What About Small Businesses? The Gdpr And Its Consequences For Small U.S.-Based Companies, Craig Mcallister
What About Small Businesses? The Gdpr And Its Consequences For Small U.S.-Based Companies, Craig Mcallister
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Fast-approaching changes to European data privacy law will have consequences around the globe. Historically, despite having dramatically different approaches to data privacy and data protection, the European Union and the United States developed a framework to ensure that the highspeed freeway that is transatlantic data transfer moved uninterrupted. That framework was overturned in the wake of revelations regarding U.S. surveillance practices, and amidst skepticism that the United States did not adequately protect personal data. Further, the European Union enacted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a sweeping overhaul of the legal data protection landscape that will take effect in May …
Like A Bad Neighbor, Hackers Are There: The Need For Data Security Legislation And Cyber Insurance In Light Of Increasing Ftc Enforcement Actions, Jennifer Gordon
Like A Bad Neighbor, Hackers Are There: The Need For Data Security Legislation And Cyber Insurance In Light Of Increasing Ftc Enforcement Actions, Jennifer Gordon
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Privacy has come to the forefront of the technology world as third party hackers are constantly attacking companies for their customers’ data. With increasing instances of compromised customer information, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has been bringing suit against companies for inadequate data security procedures. The FTC’s newfound authority to bring suit regarding cybersecurity breaches, based on the Third Circuit’s decision in FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., is a result of inaction—Congress has been unable to pass sufficient cybersecurity legislation, causing the FTC to step in and fill the void in regulation. In the absence of congressional action, this self-proclaimed …
“Hello…It’S Me. [Please Don’T Sue Me!]” Examining The Fcc’S Overbroad Calling Regulations Under The Tcpa, Marissa A. Potts
“Hello…It’S Me. [Please Don’T Sue Me!]” Examining The Fcc’S Overbroad Calling Regulations Under The Tcpa, Marissa A. Potts
Brooklyn Law Review
Americans have received unwanted telemarketing calls for decades. In response to a rapid increase in pre-recorded calls made using autodialer devices, Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in 1992. The TCPA imposes restrictions on calls made to consumers’ residences and wireless phones using autodialer devices, even if they are not telemarketing calls. Congress appointed the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to prescribe rules and regulations to enforce the TCPA. In 2015, the FCC released an order that defined autodialer more broadly under the statute. Consequently, devices that have the potential to become autodialers in the future, even if they …