Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accrued dividend (1)
- Adverse interest (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Compulsory liquidation (1)
- Corporations law (1)
-
- Derivative action (1)
- Direct action (1)
- Disenfranchisement (1)
- Dissident shareholder (1)
- Divestiture (1)
- Executive compensation (1)
- Freeze-out (1)
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corporation (1)
- Inherent power of equity (1)
- Lebold v. Inland Steel Co. (1)
- Prohibitory injunction (1)
- Relief determination (1)
- Rescission (1)
- Section 11 (1)
- Section 15 (1)
- Section 7 (1)
- Shareholder (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Stock (1)
- Stockholder vote (1)
- United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (1)
- Wind up (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Stockholder Votes Motivated By Adverse Interest: The Attack And The Defense, Earl Sneed
Stockholder Votes Motivated By Adverse Interest: The Attack And The Defense, Earl Sneed
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to study stockholder votes motivated by adverse interest from the standpoint of the attack and the defense. First, the remedies available to the complaining minority are examined. Then follows a study of the indicia of adverse interest in specific shareholder actions. Knowledge of the nature and import of these indicia should enable the careful lawyer to avoid or defeat the charge that unconscionable adverse interest vitiated the result of a stockholder vote.
Antitrust Laws- Judicial Relief For Violations Of Section Seven Of The Clayton Act - Disenfranchisement In United States V. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Barbara B. Burt S. Ed.
Antitrust Laws- Judicial Relief For Violations Of Section Seven Of The Clayton Act - Disenfranchisement In United States V. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Barbara B. Burt S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
This comment will approach section 7 relief questions and solutions primarily in the light of du Pont's unique facts, which included a vertical stock acquisition made thirty years before the judicial proceeding plus the complicating factors of vast financial interests, numerous innocent investors and several corporate interrelationships. Thereby were posed complex problems regarding (1) parties to the relief determination, (2) interests to be affected by the decree and (3) the manner of affecting those interests.